People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Particularly, people behavior depends upon the environment in which they live, what type of education they are perusing and relationship with people surrounding them. I mostly agree with the above statement of people’s behavior are largely determined by forces rather than their own making as it is mostly depending upon the condition in which they react or towards the situation they are involved.
Firstly, a child’s mind is full of curiosity and always eager to learn new things. The children mind is vacant and influences by the environment in which they are living. Their minds are constructive as well as destructive according to the responses towards other people thought or activities. For instance, People can behave according to their relationship with other people. One becomes pedantic with the relation with scholar’s people whereas one becomes broker with their relationship with other thieves. Thus, one’s mind can behave according to the percussive they gain with the relation of other people.
Secondly, people can learn behavior or interest according to their principle or idealism. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi or Bhagwat Singh both fought against British government in order to make India independence. Although, they fought for the same reason but their path was different. Mahatma Gandhi choose the path of non-violence whereas Bhagwat Singh preferred violence in his movement. Bhagwat Singh believed in the theme of Eye for an Eye by learning from British cruelty or demolished towards Indian naivety people whereas Mahatma Gandhi believed in non-resistive movement or he used to say eye for an eye made the whole world blind. Although their principles were different but their motive were same which was to make India independence from British Regime and these principles were formed according to believe towards the forces that they thought to bring changes in the society.
Thirdly, people behavior is different according to the situation or different phase of the time. The same guy you met early morning can have different moods at different time period. You can feel anger, cherish or positively from the same person which is particularly determined by the forces or their character towards different activities. For instance, the good vibes person can be irritated by their boss appearance or their propensity towards him or her. Similarly, people moods can be altered according to the harmony or dissonance with their co-partners.
However, some people may argue that sometimes their behavior can be made according to their demand or role. For instance, an alcoholic teacher can show moral character of being non-alcoholic while teaching the moral principle of life. But, most of the situation, above recommendation cannot work and their behavior can be influenced by the forces surrounding them.
In conclusion, people way of behaving particularly depends upon the forces they are surrounded like their environment, their influential and their qualification.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rces rather than their own making as it is mostly depending upon the condition in which they react ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Gandhi) must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...heir path was different. Mahatma Gandhi choose the path of non-violence whereas Bhagwa...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vibes'' or 'vibe's'?
Suggestion: vibes'; vibe's
...rent activities. For instance, the good vibes person can be irritated by their boss a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43683083512 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83412294856 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464668094218 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.862689985 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.391304348 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3043478261 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04347826087 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250299327552 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813457157069 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652772871974 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143503346394 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582080226386 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.