People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I

Essay topics:

People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

It is always better to make conscious choices. Decisions that are taken after enough cerebration are more likely to yield better results than decisions taken in a hurry. Further, after analyzing the consequences, we are better prepared for what is expected to come. Thus, when it comes to taking risky decisions or performing risky actions, using a considerable amount of time thinking about the ramifications of the actions is always recommended.
First of all, I define risky actions as those actions which can have negative outcomes. As the outcomes can be detrimental, people should always try to avoid those actions. If evading the action is not possible, thinking about how it can be done to obtain better results always helps. For instance, if a mountain climber is aware of the fact that he/she can lose his/her life if he/she does not properly follow the guidelines for climbing, the climber will be extra cautious and the risks of losing life or injuring oneself decreases. Thus, acknowledging that risks exist and preparing to avoid those risky consequences will help in preventing the negative consequences.
In addition to it, being prepared for the consequences helps people be mentally and physically ready for the negative outcomes. While performing venturesome actions, it is always better to be prepared for the worst. Let us take an example of two paragliders. One of them is aware of the dangers of paragliding and has health and life insurance. The other is obsessed only with the fun associated with the sport and does not have any insurance. If both of them face accidents, the first would be able to pay for his/her medical bills or his/her family can get some money if he/she dies. However, the second paraglider will have to pay for his/her bill by himself/herself and the family will not get anything if he/she dies. Hence, expecting negative consequences and preparing for them helps while undertaking bold actions.
Although being prepared for the consequences is ideal, it is not always pragmatic. In decisions that are time bound, people might not get enough time to think. For example, if an airplane is hijacked and the officials are given only five minutes to decide, they cannot spend a lot of time thinking about the consequence and should take an action that seems the best at that situation. However, even in such cases, trying to utilize any available time might be beneficial in optimizing the possibility of a desired outcome.
At length, whenever time permits, it is better to think about the outcomes of a risky action. This would make sure that people try to avoid undesired outcomes and also be indemnified against the possible losses incurred. Sometimes, people might not get enough time to think about all the consequences, but making attempts to think about the major consequences increases the chances of getting better results.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'first of all']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.192015209125 0.240241500013 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.207224334601 0.157235817809 132% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0931558935361 0.0880659088768 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551330798479 0.0497285424764 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0304182509506 0.0444667217837 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115969581749 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.074144486692 0.0406280797675 182% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.75822655228 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0342205323194 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0950570342205 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.032319391635 0.0249443105267 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0152091254753 0.0148568991511 102% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2881.0 2732.02544248 105% => OK
No of words: 476.0 452.878318584 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0525210084 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367647058824 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.258403361345 0.280924506359 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205882352941 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11974789916 0.132149295362 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75822655228 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468487394958 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 53.1551086176 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8333333333 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7869767666 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.041666667 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 0.674092028746 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 45.6736694678 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.30519480519 1.64882698954 79% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304058345427 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134034499425 0.123202303941 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105419108378 0.077325440228 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.488346232381 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124323435166 0.149214159877 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116228609706 0.161403998019 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590391543098 0.0892212321368 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.411579315296 0.385218514788 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0835404578396 0.0692045440612 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209918445452 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334293293984 0.0653680567796 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.