Can a person be deeply committed to an idea mean that they are diffident about it at the same time as mentioned by the author? History says otherwise.
Faraday spent around twenty five years moving a magnet in and around a copper coil to find the right combination that can produce electricity. There would have been days where he might have lost hope but, finally he figured the right way. Such was his committment to his idea, there are various such examples such as the Indian Space Research Organization. Now known for its achievements, but had its own share of disasters. It had seen various failed rocket launches and the government was criticized for diverting the money to such fancy projects instead of using it to alleviate the poor. Had it's scientists been critical of their work or their ideas, there would be no ISRO.
In the past various social reformers such as Raja Ram Mohan Roy have faught draconian cultural practices against women in India, Mahatma Gandhi during Independence movement of India, Martin Luther King Jr for the rights of African-Americans and Nelson Mandela against Apartheid. No where in the history, can we find examples where these people have cowered or have thought otherwise about their ideas. This and the examples of various organizations like ISRO show that a person or a group of people who doubt their ideas cannot be deeply committed to it.
But there are cases where people must study the implications of their ideas or policies from every angle. Consider the case of a politician who wishes to bring in a new law, he must look at both the positive and the negative aspects of it before presenting it in the assembly. We can take the example of Demonetisation that took place in India, various low income groups have been affected and are still feeling it's effect till date. The policy makers boasted it as an anti-corruption measure but, had they been bit more critical about their idea, they would have implemented it better.
When a person is deeply committed to an idea they will show their diligence, remain sedulous and if they doubt their own beliefs they cannot be said deeply committed.
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 66
- To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. 33
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 66
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: NOW
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
...s and Nelson Mandela against Apartheid. No where in the history, can we find examp...
Line 7, column 513, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
...i-corruption measure but, had they been bit more critical about their idea, they wo...
Line 7, column 580, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...ir idea, they would have implemented it better. When a person is deeply committed t...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85597826087 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60019987735 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557065217391 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3262353173 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121779814885 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435294367453 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348857288205 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752846633555 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141655067198 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.