People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
People, that are committed to a goal on a deep emotional level, will have several reasons to be as critical to this goal as they only can. Indisputably, people like to judge, an even be overly critical towards a topic without a proper basis on which this criticism is build upon. Yet, the most deeply committed person will want to make sure, to assess every point of the issue, in order for it to succeed, and hence will try to find more possible problems with this issue as anybody else. Thus i generally agree, that people most deeply connected to a cause, will also be the most critical of all.
While there is an incredibly high level of maturity needed for this kind of honest self-reflection, only a person that achieves such maturity can really be deeply committed to it. For this person it will be so important to make that goal come true, that this person will forget any wish-thinking and instead will try to predict every possible bad outcome in order to prevent it. One such person that has mastered this to the fullest is Elon Musk. His deep motivation to send humanity to another planet has caused him to also be the most critical person towards his own company SpaceX. At the early stages of the company he was not referred to as a micro manager, but as a nano manager, as he dived so deeply into every single aspect of his company in order to find possible problems, that an employee, less committed to this cause, might overlook.
Another reason for a deeply committed person to be critical, is also, to be able to convince any of his opponents of his cause. The ancient greek politician Pericles had mastered this trait. Before going to the empodium and talking to the people, he would think day and night about his plan, trying to find any weak point that could be found, and only then, after either changing his plan to no longer include any weak point, or disarm them, he would present his idea or policy, and convince every single critic of it. With Athen as the first and truest democracy, where many of the citizens personally attended such discussions, this was a necessity for his plans to be executed. The burgeon of Athens and the sudden collapse after his death speak of the success of this method.
Surely one could argue, that there are no limits to the pessimism of a person towards any given idea, but such a person will not count as critical, as a critical opinion always necessitates an objective position. Once personal interests or believes are considered, and the person does not react to logical argumentation, it will be mere obdurate pessimism and nothing more.
In conclusion, although it is understandable to state, that there could always be a person criticizing an idea more than any of ist most committed proponents, such a person will not count as critical because of a lack of objectivity. Great Leaders such as the ancient Pericles, or the very vivid Elon Musk show, that at the deepest level of commitment, one will develop a maturity that will make a most critical position towards any idea or policy a necessity for this idea or policy to succeed.
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve66
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de75
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because they enjoy feeling comfortable and fear the unknown.75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...oblems with this issue as anybody else. Thus i generally agree, that people most dee...
Line 9, column 682, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...necessity for his plans to be executed. The burgeon of Athens and the sudden collapse after...
Line 17, column 371, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'maturity'.
...t level of commitment, one will develop a maturity that will make a most critical position...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, look, really, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2573.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 550.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67818181818 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50901449159 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.0257600868 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.944444444 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157514885201 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626375818364 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516160411508 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105822289005 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608061733946 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.