People who hold high expectations for others are rewarded with high performance and respect.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and /ore examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Not all the people are able to recognize talent or just a quality in other ones and to give them all their support in order to help their pupils. However, because of the increasing competition in sportive and working scenes a figure who help others in the growth while strongly believing in them is even more appreciated and is becoming fundamental for our society. Therefore, they are not only loved by the ones they are helping but also by the whole society.
Firstly, the person that succeed in gaining the results wanted for so long will be glad to his supporter for his help for all of his life. As a matter of fact, many of us are not able to hold on and continue fighting for their dreams by themselves. For this reason, everybody should need to have someone beside that, even in the worst moments, motivates them to keep going in order to achieve their beloved goals. For instance, many talented football player when they are asked about their career and about how they were able to become a star, they start talking about their first supporter and about how much he has been important for them.
Furthermore, people who hold high expectation for others are openly admires even from external people. Even if it can be argued that they are just favoriting one single person, they provide benefits to all the people who are related to him. Thus, in a world where competition is becoming crueler and crueler people who has the chance to assist to acts of fraternity always get inspired from that. As a consequence, they feel grate for these people and try to do the same thing on others.
In conclusion, people who try to see potential not just in themselves but also in others are deeply admired by everyone since they are not just acting for the improvement of one single person but also for the evolution of the society as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, talking about, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60909090909 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37476208271 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7796848049 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.21951772744 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135657757136 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592628801146 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502418375486 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890949750719 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339504215632 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.