Decision making is an art that is developed since the beginning itself, from the time a child starts developing a thinking capability. In school, we decide to make friends, when we grow up, we decide our field of study, our food choices, our fashion ethics and hence making a decision in all aspects of life, small or big. A good decision always helps to resolve issues, thus resulting in time management and lucid thoughts. A very important thing to be considered here is that all these decisions are subject to change w.r.t different people and different circumstances. Some people prefer emotion over rationality and others rationality over emotion. It solely depends on an individual how he/she perceives a situation and exhibits his decisiveness towards it.
Now, the question is what is a powerful decision-making? How do we decide that the decision one is taking is correct or incorrect, rational or irrational, sound or vague? Well, answers to these questions cannot be jotted down unequivocally. They are dependent on umpteen factors, situations, and instances. We cannot unanimously declare that the people who make decisions based on emotion then try to justify them with logic are poor decision makers. It is possible that emotion-driven decisions too carry a significant proportion of rationality attached to them. It is definitely plausible that emotion-based rationality can ultimately help one in making a more sound decision. And well, to be blunt, this is how we define the art of decision making, an apt proportion of emotion amalgamated with an apt proportion of logic, not neglecting the criticality of the situation.
Let's take the example of a family, there are so many instances that can be enumerated when we talk about decision making in a family. The head of the family, let's say dad or mom cannot always weigh their decisions on lucrative ideas and logical thinking. Many a time, they need to open up their emotional smattering of the brain and make a decision that is in favor of the entire family, not forgetting that it does contain a considerable thought process and is not entirely emotion-driven. But yes, certainly when things like love, commitment and empathy probe in, decisions tend to escalate from rationality towards emotion. This is witnessed in almost all relationships we come across.
Now let's move our attention to the entirely different category of decisions that are logic-driven rather than emotion. First, it is absolutely futile to declare that any decision can be solely logic-driven, it will definitely have a certain emotion associated with it. For instance, when we talk about politicians, they tend to show people that all their decisions are emotion based and with regard to the welfare of the people, but in reality, they are looking forward to all sorts of benefits and perks that these decisions are going to bring along. Similar is the case of businessmen, decisions are in favor of their company and company employees, hence an emotion and logic walking hand in hand. Hence, it would be obscure to conclude that emotion-based decision makers who tend to reason their decisions with logic are poor decision makers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to carry'?
Suggestion: to carry
... possible that emotion-driven decisions too carry a significant proportion of rationality...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ng the criticality of the situation. Lets take the example of a family, there are...
^^^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith regard to the welfare of the people, but in reality, they are looking forward...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, so, then, thus, well, for instance, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2664.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.113243762 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92869845145 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497120921305 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5588955363 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7083333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29166666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51156509219 0.243740707755 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156011448939 0.0831039109588 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142935966898 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33899348896 0.150359130593 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114247419295 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.