As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
As the dependence on Technology increases with each passing decade, the ability of humans to think will not deteriorate but move one level ahead. Technology leads to ease, that is, technological advancements have lead to the discovery of umpteen devices and products that have resulted in a gradual decrease in human effort and time. Today, we are able to connect with thousands of people over the globe, how? We are able to pay our telephone, electricity and credit card bills with a single click, how? Medical treatments and hospitals are endowed with such advanced machinery that can diagnose several diseases in a jiffy, how? We are able to deploy human intelligence into machines to make them smarter than ever, how? Technology is the answer to all these questions. Technology has not only made our lives easier but also helped us to go and think beyond the ordinary, it has empowered our brains to achieve all that was once considered implausible. Be it in the field of Education, Science, Engineering or Medicine, technology has made its ubiquitous mark in almost all sphere of life.
Coming to the context of self-deterioration with the advent of Technology, I strongly disagree with the statement. When technology brought new designs and products, along with it, it brought new techniques and myriad aspects to work upon them. It not only made lives more convenient but also demanded the skill set and knowledge work upon them. Product designing, invention, and improvisation is one thing and having adequate expertise knowledge to bring it to its most efficient use is another.
The problem-solving scenario has taken an all-new shape with the engendering use of technology in our daily lives. Now, we don’t need to remember our doctor’s appointments or client meetings, we have Google to do that for us. If we are commuting to an unknown place, we have Maps to guide, to reach our destination. Not only is this more human-friendly, but more comprehensible and accurate as well. Ability to recall all roads and cities is obviously something that a human brain can never accomplish. Hence, technology. I would rather believe that technology has made us smarter than it has deteriorated our ability to think. It has made us more attentive, pragmatic and proactive. We are learning new bits here and there and this is ultimately boosting our level of confidence, and self-confidence is, of course, one of the most vital keys to survival in this competitive world. Let us thank technology for bringing ease, satisfaction, and happiness to our lives and look forward to making the best use of it for the common good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1011, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld of Education, Science, Engineering or Medicine, technology has made its ubiqui...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04118993135 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99803656073 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546910755149 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1476122876 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.136363636 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13636363636 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19395291714 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564371918304 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586762027295 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120171535582 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055655736746 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.