To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve

It will be an obscure statement if we say that the overall development of a country is dependent only on its major cities. Yes, big or small, cities are like those crucial wheels of a car that can’t be driven even if one of them is missing. In order to understand the most important characteristics of a society, more focus should be given on the not so major cities rather than the major ones, who are yet to make progress in terms of social, economic and political development. When we talk about social development, we are addressing the educational, health and welfare needs of the society. These are already up to the mark in a majority of the big cities, so there’s nothing much to understand other than implementing similar structures and policies in the minor ones as well. The small, developing cities devoid of sufficient facilities deserve more attention of the concerned authorities and the government. Such cities need careful examination of the areas where education and healthcare amenities can be improved. E.g., it should be ensured that schools are well equipped and facilitate a student’s learning in today’s tech-savvy world like modern libraries and laboratories, facility to have knowledge transfer between students across the borders, indoor and outdoor games facilities, etc.

Talking about the economic status of the people in the cities, I don’t deny the fact that people in big cities have a tremendous purchasing power, a lavish lifestyle and well-paying job opportunities. You must agree to the point that is doesn’t demand as much attention as the people in smaller cities who are devoid of a sedentary lifestyle, superfluous money, and good employment opportunities. It is somewhat important as well as necessary for a country to focus on these people, educate themselves about their problems and take steps for their upliftment, open up new doors for their development and ensure that the resources or opportunities reach the correct set of people.

Coming to the political aspects, there is a great need to get in touch with the people of smaller cities, gather insights from them and define suitable policies and reforms for their upliftment. This will not only bring a sense of equality amongst all but also help to bridge the gap between the rural and the urban cities altogether. People will feel they are heard and revered and the inferiority complex will eventually fade away.

Let’s take the example of a developing nation like India, where the rich are getting richer and the poor is getting poorer. This is because the already well-off cities are enjoying the incentives and opportunities whereas the small cities are still deprived of the basic amenities. The gap between the rich and the poor is increasing day by day. This needs immediate attention and suitable steps need to be taken in order to study the above-mentioned characteristics of the small cities. It is necessary to inculcate amongst the Government that a country as a whole can never progress if the poor or the deprived are left behind. A developing nation can only be tagged as a Developed Nation when unanimously all its cities, big or small enjoy equal incentives and are equally developed and well off.

Votes
Average: 5.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndoor and outdoor games facilities, etc. Talking about the economic status of the...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., if, so, still, well, whereas, talking about, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2727.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08768656716 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93364689613 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501865671642 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7368816269 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.35 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122288787102 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336953087455 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379593647212 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0676405137471 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306094648946 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.