People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

Emotions are social being's deepest thought and how they relate to a particular thing at a particular instant of time at a particular place. Each individual have different perspectives towards life and henceforth develop different emotions. For instance, an educator might believe that a silent treatment given to a student for not obeying the instructions is far better than scolding, holding the emotion that anger only hurt student's ego whereas some other teacher would not react the same way. The statement that decisions taken on behalf of emotions as the base and justifying it later with a rational approach is inane is considerate to some extent. Taking into account the complexity of battle between heart and mind, major questions could be raised in the integrity of the issue.

To commence with, the greatest fight between the heart and mind are played by doctors, army officials, etc. If they start taking decisions with an irrational approach, they would not be able to serve the purpose they are assigned for. For instance, if the son of a police officer committed a lurid crime, what do you the think the officer should do? Should he save his very own son as their are plethora of emotions attached to his son or should he go by the rational approach and capitulate him to the police custody? If he goes for the former option, that would be injustice to the victim and his family, and cannot be justified in any case. However, duty comes before any emotion and a true police officer will choose the path that is actually right. Hence, it proves the author statement that emotions can lead to wrong decisions.

However, the forthcoming instance will prove that it is not always the case. My great grandfather served under Nazi army and was asked to shoot all of the ten innocent Jews standing in a row. His emotions cajoled him to not shoot someone who has not committed any crime and cannot live with the guilt afterwards whereas he cannot disobey the commander's order on the other hand. In such a situation, he make a quick decision and told the commander that his rifle is rusted and hence the commander refused him to shoot. This way he was free from the guilt that he would have to live with for his rest of life. Therefore, sometimes a person cannot see what is right or wrong and with no other choice has to go with his/her intuition. In cases like above, going with your gut feeling is justified as you cannot do something told by somebody which in their perspective is right.

Another view that can weaken the issue is that all rational decisions may not necessarily lead to correct solutions. I have very well experienced the case recently. In last semester, we have choices among department electives and we could opt either soft computing or management information system. Soft computing is related to artificial intelligence and is both theoretical and numerical subject whereas Management Information system is a pure theoretical subject. I would love to opt for soft computing as been learning in the field from the beginning and the other subject I have no interest in. Eventually, I got to know from seniors that teachers in the not-so-likeable subject teach pretty well and reward with good grades however that is not the case with soft computing. Therefore, I end up opting a subject which I just need to study because country like mine give preference to marks. Rationally thinking this decision would help me obtain higher score but the winds not always sail in your direction. Hence, some decisions, no matter taken how meticulously, can do produce unfavourable conclusions.

In conclusion, no one can assure the result of a decision no matter taken rationally or irrationally. The life is too uncertain and too unreliable to prove the integrity of decision. One should go with the thing what one feels to be right in its pristine form, keeping no relations, no duty, no fear in mind. Once taken a decision, have faith in yourself and be prepared to dace its ramifications.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'beings the deepest'.
Suggestion: beings the deepest
Emotions are social beings deepest thought and how they relate to a partic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er committed a lurid crime, what do you the think the officer should do? Should he save h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... do? Should he save his very own son as their are plethora of emotions attached to hi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: great-grandfather
...rove that it is not always the case. My great grandfather served under Nazi army and was asked to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... under Nazi army and was asked to shoot all of the ten innocent Jews standing in a row. Hi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'makes'.
Suggestion: makes
...the other hand. In such a situation, he make a quick decision and told the commander...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in any case, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3332.0 2235.4752809 149% => OK
No of words: 688.0 442.535393258 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84302325581 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.12149920406 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67678737362 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 348.0 215.323595506 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505813953488 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1053.0 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4014566781 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168844199541 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402654115107 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555255486541 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09225004311 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028259629122 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.