Educational institutions are a platform to spread knowledge and to nurture students to the best of their ability. The recommendation presents a view that educational institution's job is to discourage pupils to not study fields where the probability of being successful is very low. Due to the number of loopholes present in the argument, I certainly do not agree with the claim.
To commence with, for an institution to predict which field will help a particular person succeed is unreasonable. An educator cannot take decisions regarding the career which will make the student successful as there are myriad factors to take into consideration. These include field of study, and most importantly, the honesty of student towards the subject, their dedication, their intelligence quotient, and their level of practice. These all directly or indirectly in the success of the student. For instance, during admissions into college for under-graduation, most engineering institutes advised to pursue computer science as it is at its peak in the market. However, after completion of the course, many pupils were not satisfied with their education as they did not find computer programming very interesting. Hence, those students were not as successful as they could be if they have opted for subjects of their interest. Thereafter, choosing study field based on someone else's disposition might not lead into student's favor.
Secondly, dissuading students from pursuing fields of study of their choice also leads to demotivation and loss of inner-belief. With rapidly growing world, today there exist ample opportunities in every field. Additionally, unconventional job ideas are blowing people's mind and helped them reach the acme of life. Had Steve Jobs never learnt calligraphy, or his teachers told him as there is not much future in it, Apple would not have been introduced. Therefore, knowledge is an asset to the human, irrespective of its subject, it allows him or her to find a direction in life. So, discouraging a person to enrich himself or herself in a field is more of an offense.
Thirdly, on the flip side, if a student is unaware of its interest and how to proceed in life, then it is the responsibility of the educator to guide and show direction to him. For example, to quote example from my life, after class tenth, I was totally confused and had no idea whether to move ahead with biology or mathematics in high school. When I approached my teacher, she suggested to take mathematics and explained that I am not very good at cramming things but at logical thinking and henceforth will be beneficial. Consequently, my educator's explanation did help me to to achieve a good position in society today. Hence, the institution should intervene only if the student is unaware of it's interest.
In summary, I vehemently cling to the notion that schools or universities are responsible to educate students and help them seek opportunities in various fields with respect to their interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to study'
Suggestion: to study
...of their interest. Thereafter, choosing study field based on someone elses dispositio...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested taking'.
Suggestion: suggested taking
...hool. When I approached my teacher, she suggested to take mathematics and explained that I am not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 577, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...y, my educators explanation did help me to to achieve a good position in society toda...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, as to, for example, for instance, in summary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1618852459 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06248680267 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1500234661 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.52173913 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47826086957 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327599821366 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827882066415 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660911375688 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1644021042 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505246499484 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.