Everything in universe evolves with time, what is considered factual centuries ago is proven wrong today and is no more a fact. For instance, earlier it was believed that sun revolves around earth, however now, earth revolves around the sun is considered a fact. The universe is colossal and unknown to know what phenomenon it exactly holds. As per the claim, any piece of information that people assume is factual should be mistrusted, as it might turn out inaccurate in future is true only until there is no proper reasoning or most probable theory.
Firstly, not all facts can be mistrusted with the thought that they might change in future. Addition of two and two is four is the epitome of facts that will not change in future no matter what. Hence if there exists a well defined mathematical proof to a case, no one can ever deny and should be trusted with complete confidence.
Secondly, not believing facts might lead to a era where making discoveries and inventions will become quite arduous or in minimal case impossible. Only if we believe in facts and assume that it will remain same then there is hope that new findings are possible. Had people not believed on Newton's laws of motion in awe that they might get unjustified in future, whole mechanics could not have evolved. We believe in fact because there is a rational reasoning or a mathematical proof behind it.
Thirdly, there are cases when the facts are proven false or might get modified in future and therefore we cannot rely on all the theories and their henceforth results as facts. For instance, Newon proposed the particle nature of light but afterwards Bohr proposed the wave nature of light and today light is considered to have dual nature. Universe is too colossal and a mystery that might never entangle completely, hence one should keep on researching and validating the truth of facts.
In summary, the facts with defined mathematical proof or valid evidences or with rational reasoning should be trusted and used for further derivations. Nevertheless, the existing fact can be proven false with new findings or discoveries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...with the thought that they might change in future. Addition of two and two is four is the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ll not change in future no matter what. Hence if there exists a well defined mathemat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ndly, not believing facts might lead to a era where making discoveries and invent...
^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... in awe that they might get unjustified in future, whole mechanics could not have evolved...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th results as facts. For instance, Newon proposed the particle nature of light bu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for instance, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92737430168 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62380176364 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516759776536 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.824504214 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.25 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264460882941 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833663120919 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954531154635 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141615945758 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762809369034 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.