People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

The given statement tells us that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those emotions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. The given statement is marred by indiscriminate word choice which greatly reduces its efficacy and renders the sentiment expressed superficial. The statement becomes polemical, opinionated and subjective in nature which compromises the clarity, potency and the sentiment expressed.

To begin with use of word emotion as it is a very broad term used in above statement and should be specified in it. Emotion is a broad term which represent different kind of emotions as above statement states that decision taken based on emotion are poor decisions while it is true for some of the emotions such as anger, revenge, greed, jealousy are not good for decision making but there are some emotions which have salubrious effect on decision making, such emotions include confidence, calmness etc. For example, if a student studies with the emotion of jealousy, belittling his peers in a particular subject then the decision taken by that in exam or regarding studies would have detrimental effect on him but the same student studies with the emotion of curiosity and enjoyment would make correct decision in that subject and excel in it. Therefore, above statement should have specified the kind of emotion.

Additionally, it can be argued that above statement fails to consider the situations due to which one has to take decision based on emotions or not. As we know that every decision taken by us is based on the situation that compels us to take certain decision while some situations are like that decisions taken with emotions have detrimental effect while other situations in which decision is based on emotions have genial effect. For example in a time of war army has to take decisions without considering emotions of its soldiers because decisions taken based on emotions in war time can have disastrous after effects while it is not case for politicians as politicians have to take decision based on the people's emotions. Thus, type of situation should be specified by the statement.

Above statement states that people who takes decision based on emotion and justified those decisions afterwards are poor decision makers. Sentiment expressed by this statement is bigoted in the sense that it view only one side of a process ignoring the other. As good decision makers are the one who takes decision based on situation and knows its after effects wether those decision are based on emotion or not.

It can be concluded that by ignoring the factors that are critical for assessment of the statement given above in a comprehensive manner the issue becomes somewhat unilateral and subject to subjective generalization. On grounds of pure logic and reason one cannot agree with this statement which suffers a great extent due to use of words that are in themselves poorly defined and used in desultory manner.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...indiscriminate word choice which greatly reduces its efficacy and renders the sen...
^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rs the sentiment expressed superficial. The statement becomes polemical, opinionate...
^^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...are poor decisions while it is true for some of the emotions such as anger, revenge, greed,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...take decision based on emotions or not. As we know that every decision taken by us...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...situations in which decision is based on emotions have genial effect. For example...
^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...s decision based on situation and knows its after effects wether those decision are...
^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a comprehensive manner" with adverb for "comprehensive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...assessment of the statement given above in a comprehensive manner the issue becomes somewhat unilateral a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, kind of, such as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11728395062 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70327539185 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397119341564 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.8548234648 60.3974514979 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.4375 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.375 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413547169303 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163239441418 0.0831039109588 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149827024221 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259417371879 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105355559577 0.0667264976115 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.