People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The claim made above states that by explaining the logic and true motive of a decision after it's implementation we are undermining the decision make's clarity of thought and also his credentials as a decision maker. There is a lot of important factors that go into making a decision , that may end up having a large number of significant ramifications and impact on the customers and employees that seemed to benefit from the services of the organization earlier.
As we know that a decision taken has some impact on the common people, we need to understand the true motive behind the decision being taken. Sometimes a decision is taken without considering the kind of impact and effect it may. As per the claim made in the passage we can infer that the author assumes that such decisions, are called upon for their lack of success. At that time justifying the motive and implementation of the decision is unethical as it obviously states that the decision maker had not given prior thought before making the decision. Thus in occurrence of such a scenario we can clearly state that the person or group that undertook this responsibility as poor decision makers.
For example, consider a company like HUL which mass produces various commodities that are most commonly used by all of us. If tomorrow the company takes an abrupt and quick decision to cut down on it's work staff or increase the average value of it's products, it will have a lot of effects. Customers will buy from rival brands that make use of this opportunity. Now the key factor is to understand why did the company take such a decision hastily. At that point in time if the CEO or the decision maker does not have a plausible or cogent justification to it, then it may very well cost him his job.Thus when massive corporations undertake any decision a lot of though and clarity is put into it. The possible ramifications of the decision taken are evaluated and juxtaposed against each other. A lot of experts and shareholders are consulted, the effect of the decision on the market and profitability towards the organization and a plethora of other factors and parameters need to be considered.
However even though the claim made above seems unethical and against all possible rules, there are always exceptions that occur. A decision taken suddenly and hastily may end up having good outcomes. Even though at the point of making the decision the outcomes may not have been as luck or fortune may have it in some cases it may end proving to be actually and logically beneficial to everyone. At that time the decision makers are termed as visionaries or heroes.
Thus from the passage we can conclude that there are two sides to every coin and there are the pros and cons of every case. To term someone as a poor decision maker we need to really understand the motives and the ideology behind the making of that decision. Thus to term someone as a poor decision maker seems like a blunt instrument to use and may end tarnishing the image and reputation of that individual forever.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t factors that go into making a decision , that may end up having a large number o...
^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ing a decision , that may end up having a large number of significant ramifications and impact on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age we can infer that the author assumes that such decisions, are called upon for...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ior thought before making the decision. Thus in occurrence of such a scenario we ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... making the decision. Thus in occurrence of such a scenario we can clearly state ...
^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
... then it may very well cost him his job.Thus when massive corporations undertake any...
^^^^
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... then it may very well cost him his job.Thus when massive corporations undertake any...
^^^^
Line 5, column 688, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ision a lot of though and clarity is put into it. The possible ramifications of t...
^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs are termed as visionaries or heroes. Thus from the passage we can conclude th...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e termed as visionaries or heroes. Thus from the passage we can conclude that t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ogy behind the making of that decision. Thus to term someone as a poor decision make...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, really, so, then, thus, well, for example, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75187969925 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70359532463 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456766917293 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1404489141 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.380952381 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30799212374 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103789445058 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630424538763 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192815576672 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247369938893 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.