People who make decisions based on emotion and justify
those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers
Decision of a people is what makes him different from the others. Good decision
must be a result of objectivity and impartiality. Thus, to make good a decision,
everyone needs to be more focused on the facts and details rather than how he feels
about anything. I tend to agree with the speaker since emotion and attachments are
found to be notorious to make weaker decisions.
As mentioned earlier , a single decision is a key factor for many inter related
thongs that how they will proceed in future, like an butterfly effect. So, whim of a
single person should not be a important factor for decision making process. For
instance, whim of Hitlar to eradicate Jews from the world led world war II. He
personally used to believe that Jews are responsible for the lost of Germany both in
the battle field and treaties afterwards. Based upon how he feels about them, he
declared mission to decimate them which became costlier for Germany and
himself. If he would have cogitated all the factors for loss not just being dependent
upon his whim, the war should be prevented and loss could be avoided.
Furthermore, many terrorist groups are active in this world creating terror among
common people on the basis of what they feel about themselves, their religion and
their caste. They think superior of themselves and always want to dominate other
world. These fallacious decisions led to destruction of themselves and other
innocent people, which is proves so far. Thus, if they consider existence of other
people in the world and make more practical decision about supremacy and order,
such destruction world have prohibited.
In the same case, however the decision made by emotion found to be beneficial
sometimes. A mother loves his child not by foreseeing how he will look like in the
future. Her love based upon emotions makes us alive and give inspiration to live
lively throughout the life. Also, people of one country support people of other
country in the time of natural natural cataclysm, like people of India, America,
china and other country supported Nepalese at the time of earthquake in 2015. This
was solely because of emotion of people of those county to help. So, sometimes we
need to listen to our heart to make better decisions too.
To sum up, everyone just need to be more honest with facts and numbers to make
better decision mostly except for very rare cases when we do need to listen to our
heart. A strong decision makers takes good care of how his decision is going to
make change by not being biased due to his whim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eaker decisions. As mentioned earlier , a single decision is a key factor for m...
^^
Line 8, column 35, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ated thongs that how they will proceed in future, like an butterfly effect. So, whim of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t how they will proceed in future, like an butterfly effect. So, whim of a single...
^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... whim of a single person should not be a important factor for decision making pr...
^
Line 14, column 16, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had cogitated'?
Suggestion: had cogitated
...ostlier for Germany and himself. If he would have cogitated all the factors for loss not just being...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 24, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: natural
...people of other country in the time of natural natural cataclysm, like people of India, Americ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, except for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91156462585 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46034456674 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4179609858 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 33.0 4.97078651685 664% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284342068194 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926107430483 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783424513073 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073384966523 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904459818823 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.