In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
According to the speaker, beginner is more likely to contribute importantly than expert. I agree to the speaker as far as the begineer uses his fresher thinking on diverse field akin to the field of study. In the same time, however if the time is limited to perform the inquiry and if inquiry is monotonous, experts can perform better.
In many types of inquires, the cases might be updating with its consequences. Experts may think all the time the same. If cases are being unconventional, how can conventionality work better?
On the other hand, beginner can think each cases with the new thoughs and ideas, that may bring about the resolution on the case.
However, sometimes if cases has petty time to be resolved, we ,might need very credible resources to solve then. If we use experience ones, then their experience may act as insurance for us. Their experience is more credible than enthusiasm of beginer ones to solve the cases.
Firstly, beginner are out of hazemony of the workplace enviroment and likely to have diverse though about a topic. They may bring about modicum ideas to speed up investigatiuon that is being held. They also have enough enthusiasm to solve any particular cases. For instance, if we let a fresh graduate to teach students of smaller gardes, then he can teach better since he has enthusiasm and being aware of childerns problem, he can be effacious.
Secondly, beginner has long way to go on that field. When their own knowledge adds up with experience of veteran ones, that surely leads to better result than ever. For instance, large tech companies like Apple, Microsoft has made proviuson to give internship and finally job to young and beginner ones . That policy is flourishing those companies.
In the final analysis, in any field of inquiry, using beginner is like two edged sword. It mighht give new way to think, reconsider and explore the possibilities. On the other hand, beginner can not be that much effacious as the experineced ones in the case of limition in terms of resources and time.
- write an essay. 3
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 50
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they entercollege rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academiccourses to offer." 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justifythose decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- In twenty years, there will be fewer cars than there are today. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... cases has petty time to be resolved, we ,might need very credible resources to so...
^^
Line 10, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d finally job to young and beginner ones . That policy is flourishing those compan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89942528736 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69510097485 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.326915089 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1904761905 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12949687142 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438020710434 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049960316143 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667968763961 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378810682474 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.