People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation,
which motivates people much more than individual competition does.
The significance of net yield of one work to access to more profits is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellation of perspectives, some may prioritize the individual output of one specific work, in contrast, there exist a myriad of persons persevering on unravelling the notion that team work outweighs the individuals’ consequences. After a bulk of scrutiny, it seems plausible that the team engenders more prospective repercussions.
To inaugurate, the first angle elucidating the latter thesis is whetting competition among the members of one group working together. To delineate, having vied to reach better triumphs and achievement, the team can have an opportunity to observe higher elevation in its ambiance. To shed more light on this fact, competition can play as a vigorous stimulus in one team to propel the individuals toward a pinnacle of prosperity. In fact, competition has the potential of divulging each person’s competency and reinforcing the skill of problem-solving of one which foretells that the persons inside the team make their strength to demonstrate their best to lead the group to a desired end. Based on this explanation, here, the predominance of competition in fortifying the team foundation can be sensed. Needless to say, without this feature, in spite of the subsistence of some development, the optimum point of accomplishment cannot be accessible.
Converge on the latter belief, the spirit of cooperation and assistance can be investigated aptly. To clarify, only when the persons feel a sense of close-nit and juxtapose to each other, can it be anticipated that they can put their heads together to make more proper responses to obviate the obstacles and barriers successfully. Thus, the more the individuals have a sense of unity and consolidation, the less the probability of argument and challenges to resolve the hardships and adversities will be appeared. Accordingly, who could deny the priority of the efficiency of team than the individuals lonely?
What I mentioned above might not be over generalized to whole contexts. There are some persons who is more inclined toward pursuing their work not in a group but in private mode, and they are also prosper and successful persons. Furthermore, they amplify the status of one special task to the most climactic point not be compared with the yield of workers in a group. As a matter of the fact, seldom can all persons be classified in this group. Needless to say, they suffer from the competition spirit, as well as, the chance of implementing the ideas of other persons to unearth more logical solution. It is all transparent that each has specific and inherit potential of aptitude which is distinguished from other humans. And, that provides the beauty and strong point of a team than an individual. In addition, if a team constitutes of different members with various visions, the team should expend more time to make a coherent decision deemed as another pitfall of a team than individuals.
Drawing upon the enumerated reasons, despite the existence of some exceptions deviated from the general rule, the benefits of the final ramifications of one team than the individuals are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate the reasons, not only does the team get privileges of collaboration of sundry thoughts of various members to discover more appropriate solutions, but also it may be predisposed to a plethora of positive contests encompassing the competition of team workers to disclose their best.
(570 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...serve higher elevation in its ambiance. To shed more light on this fact, competiti...
^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'resolving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: resolving
... probability of argument and challenges to resolve the hardships and adversities will be a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prospered'.
Suggestion: prospered
... but in private mode, and they are also prosper and successful persons. Furthermore, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 824, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...n an individual. In addition, if a team constitutes of different members with various visions,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2974.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22671353251 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1741879671 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502636203866 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 939.6 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6198396059 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.304347826 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7391304348 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52173913043 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230399013663 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658680001426 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505266455273 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141881632347 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210611727831 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 100.480337079 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.