A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Building upon the metaphor of contractarianism, and giving the incremental complexity characteristic of the social contract in proportion to ordinary legal contracts, one should strive to find out how the stipulations of maintaining or breaking such contract would be determined. Approaching a matter as contentious as criminality, those stipulations need to be both qualitatively and quantitatively specified. For example, a broad category of the types of behaviors considered in conflict with a previous consent to the contract would not suffice, but rather a concrete list that is as exhaustive as possible of the extensions of those violations and the different interpretations of their different magnitudes.
Applying this to the question of criminology, merely committing a crime cannot by any means reverse every preceding agreement, however previously maintained by the offender, and declare them an excommunicado, so to speak. Instead, as seen in most legalities around the world and reflected in the corresponding terminology, there must be a system of rules through which crimes are classified in an increasing order of magnitude and assigned punishments proportionately. That is, a crime can well range from a misdemeanor through an offence and all the way to a felony. Hence, it would be totally implausible to treat them as equal.
Furthermore, regardless of the type and magnitude of the crime committed, there will always be a minimum amount of rights deserved for the offender by virtue of both their very human nature as well as the moral code by which the legal system is holding them accountable. Unless this is maintained, it would be difficult to ascribe legitimacy to such opportunistic canon. For instance, so long as they are kept alive, they should be sufficiently fed, protected from physical or otherwise abuse, and even seen as an object of reform.
All in all, while it is fairly accurate to describe a crime as a breakage of the social contract, such breakage should not be pictured as all-or-nothing. In fact, current legal systems already show a recognition of the varied nature of the violation of the social contract that is manifested in legal terminology and scales of punishment. Also, no matter what the quality and quantity of the violation are, there will always be an inherent dimension of rights acquired for humans per se. This latter is necessitated by the requirements of maintaining the consistency of moral constructs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... virtue of both their very human nature as well as the moral code by which the legal syste...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as, so to speak
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30025445293 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31678193665 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547073791349 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0019304767 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.785714286 118.986275619 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119430584267 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367293769655 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267596184343 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723180669809 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00877265666257 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.8971910112 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.