The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph shows the counts of tourists, in millions of visitors, who had been to a Caribbean island during a 7 years period, starting from 2010 all the way up to 2017. Besides the total series, the data was further classified into two series based on their place of stay, whether on cruise ships or on the very island.
As for the overall chronological trend, the period in question saw a dramatic rise from a baseline of 1 million visitor, in 2010, to an endpoint of 3.5 million tourists in 2017. Except for the year 2016, which had almost the same total number of visitors as the preceding year, that increase was generally gradual.
However, the slope was different in the two specific segments. Those who dwelled on the island almost plateaued at 1.5 million between 2013 and 2017, with only a slight dip in 2016 at around 1.25 million. On the other hand, the number of those who chose cruise ships had oscillated for the first 4 years between approximately 0.25 million and 0.5 million. From 2013 onwards, though, the figure was steadily growing.
In toto, offshore visitors of the Caribbean island were increasing from 2010 to 2017. The possible options of stay, nonetheless, did not all increase proportionately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cruise'
Suggestion: to cruise
...her hand, the number of those who chose cruise ships had oscillated for the first 4 ye...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, nonetheless, well, as for, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84834123223 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58946520906 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60663507109 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8317639142 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141812328922 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567241577214 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577946108481 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930670510525 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270691215168 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.