Policies that focus on protecting environment should not be imposed upon multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy; even though they cause damage to the environment.
The proponent states thet the environmental policies should not be imposed upon multinational organizations. I am not in agreement with the proponent's statement and the reasons for my disagreement are stated below.
First, multinational companies are profit oriented organisations who are intersted only in their own good. Many multinational companies discharge the waste generated by their factories directly into water bodies. This leads to loss of aquatic species and also pollutes the water bodies. Some multinational companies also discharge the nuclear waste. This can lead to derimental consequences as it not only affect the water body but also affects the people living around that water body.
Second, in the current scenario of increasing global warming, exempting multinational organizations from environmental policies is not a sound decision. As multinational organizations need voluminious spaces for establishing their factories and warehouses, unrestricted cutting of trees might take place. This will in-turn lead to increase of global warming. This will also lead to loss of biodiversity which can disturb the stability of ecosystem.
Some people might argue that these organisations provide monetray benefits to nation and helps to boost economy. But, if there is no clean air to breathe, people are plagued with various diseases, and the ecological balance is unstable, what is the use of such money. One cannot restore the lost biodiversity or restore the ecological balance with the help of money. It will just lead to destruction of the nation.
To sum it up, even though multinational organizations boost the economy and generate profit, the monteray benefit is of no use if it is at the cost of loss of environment. So, no multinational company should be exempted from the environmental policies as it can lead to precarious consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'proponents'' or 'proponent's'?
Suggestion: proponents'; proponent's
...zations. I am not in agreement with the proponents statement and the reasons for my disagr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r my disagreement are stated below. First, multinational companies are profi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...anies are profit oriented organisations who are intersted only in their own good. Many ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople living around that water body. Second, in the current scenario of incre...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disturb the stability of ecosystem. Some people might argue that these organ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...just lead to destruction of the nation. To sum it up, even though multinational ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57291666667 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2369287683 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5066152031 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.4117647059 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88235294118 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167962219528 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541644203108 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741056855397 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103090805715 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081638303261 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.