Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy; even though they cause damage to the environment.
I totally disagree with the above statement that environmental protection policies should not be implemented on the MNCs because of they generate profit and boost the economy of the nation. I think that laws should be same for everyone because protection of the environment is as important as profit and economic growth. If the air we breathe isn’t clean then what is the use of profit and economic growth.
There is a saying “Health is wealth”. It states that good health is more important in life than the wealth you posses in terms of money etc. So if we allow the MNCs to run without any environmental protection policies it would the environment very badly. For example, in Agra due to the toxic gases given out of the industries the color of Taj Mahal marble turned quiet yellow. So to lower this degradation local government had to put Environmental protection policies on the MNCs near Taj Mahal.
The toxic gases and the waste material given out of the MNCs will have direct and indirect impact on our day to day life. For example, the waste thrown out of the MNCs will be sent to the local water bodies which will lead to water pollution. This will harm the aquatic life and also the water which we drink will be impure. Previously, there was news about extinction of Coral Reefs in Australia due to the waste material thrown from the MNCs. Similarly, the air will breathe will get polluted and would lead to many health and breathing problems.
So at last I want to conclude by saying that economic growth is a crucial part of our life but at the same time protecting our environment is also equally important because what will you do of the money and the wealth you posses if you don’t have proper health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...s should not be implemented on the MNCs because of they generate profit and boost the economy o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63843648208 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5026845288 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495114006515 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7935521884 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160997671042 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634655441048 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913384766843 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112646743258 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114429560716 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.