Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
People of the nation elect their representative with the great deliberation in return that the ruling party will ease the issues they face in their daily activities. Hence it is expected from the leaders to act pedestrian in solving the problems. Therefore, I agree with the author that politicians should reason with the common ideas rather than solving complex issues which do not fall under public domain.
India is a developing country, hence there are some basic issues that are needed to be solved which does not occur in a developed country in the common sight. For example, the government is planning to build the water cum amusement park in Lucknow, on the other hand, many districts of the capital city are not getting enough water supply for their household. It is estimated that almost 6 lac liters of water will be invested for the development of the water to which the denizen of the water scare districts is expressing their contempt with a public demonstration on the road. Though the idea of public strikes on the running road seems to violate the civic rules, however, the sense behind this demonstration is right as people demand their rights of the proper water supply that is imperative for their household. Thus, rather building the water park authorities should take concern on the scarcity of water.
Development of the nation is done when there is proper equity among the businessmen of country. In 2011, the government of India introduced the 100 percent FDI within the 8 capital cities which, according to them, will create more market for the international companies. However, the local garment, clothing, fast-food as well as home decor and furniture shops will get the huge lose as customer tends to shop with the better brand name. Furthermore, there will be an increase in the unemployment within the nation in the case of closure of businesses that will be going in loss. The local business contempt this proposal and demanded for the revision. In my view, it seems correct as local market will be in loss and the profit make by the international brands will not go in the hands of Indian brands. Therefore, leaders should take concern of their own people before giving the opportunities to the foreign market.
India seems to progress in a positive gradient in the field of research and development in Space organization. It is good news that our scientist are collaborating with minds of their other nations to create the rovers for the upcoming Mars mission. However, the amount of budget kept aside for space mission is staggering and there are other duties that are not getting fulfilled due to the uneven budget allocation. The road network disruption, sanitization in and around the cities, water and electricity scarcity in villages are the most common problem that india is facing. Therefore, the government should consider about existing problems before making the elusive plans in the new field.
In conclusion, the aforementioned facts give the clear vision that the government should consider making decision that can solve the problems that exist now by careful perusing before implementing on the new ideas to prosper the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...es they face in their daily activities. Hence it is expected from the leaders to act ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2665.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03780718336 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66674543047 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499054820416 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5968379412 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.904761905 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1904761905 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0860024753207 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275086853491 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055390693806 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0546881353665 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455046164754 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.