Restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve.This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet-related health problems.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Requiring restaurants to display details about the nutrition of the food they serve might be quite a lot. Restaurants would have to spend on employing a nutrition expert to carefully analyze the details of each food as it is such a delicate act that requires expertise. Also, restaurants would also have to spend on the presentation of these details so as to make it accessible to diners. This new development can even reduce the amount of customers that patronize these restaurants. Despite the number disadvantages this may cause the restaurants, the advantages are more in the long run and I definitely support the innovation.
Food is very important for the body and bad food or excess of a particular type of food can cause harm to the body. Excess fat and oil in the body causes increased cholesterol in the body which can later result to different kinds of heart related diseases. Also, excess salt can cause a trigger in the system of an hypertensive patients, renal patients too need to make careful decisions about their choice of meal. Recently, there has been increase in the number and frequency at which people eat out due to the changing nature of jobs, people are spending more time in their jobs or running their businesses, also the narrative of home cooked meal being the best is changing. Therefore, since most people who are either battling with health challenges or trying to prevent health challenges eat out, restaurants will do more good by listing the nutritional information of each meal they prepare in order for diners to make careful decisions regarding their health.
Furthermore, diners have always had the opportunity of deciding the kind of meals they choose to eat ranging from rice to beans and even to snacks, it would only be fair to give diners the opportunity to choose based on the nutritional information. This may cost the restaurants a lot but if all restaurants decide to do this together, the benefits will be realized in the long run. Diners would start trusting the restaurants more and might even encourage people who have their reservations about restaurants food to start trusting more. This means that restaurants will most likely gain more customers for themselves. Allergy is also an issue that most battle with. Some diners eat out without knowing the constituents of the food they eat in restaurants and end up having allergy crisis later on. This nutritional information will eliminate such issues.
Nutritional information of meals served in restaurants are very crucial, they may cost the restaurants a lot at first but with time it won’t be so much of an issue to the restaurants. Diners would learn to trust restaurants more and could even earn the trust people who do not really trust food eaten in restaurants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nd on the presentation of these details so as to make it accessible to diners. This new ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd I definitely support the innovation. Food is very important for the body and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol in the body which can later result to different kinds of heart related disease...
^^
Line 4, column 314, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...lt can cause a trigger in the system of an hypertensive patients, renal patients t...
^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'patient'?
Suggestion: patient
...rigger in the system of an hypertensive patients, renal patients too need to make carefu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to need'?
Suggestion: to need
...n hypertensive patients, renal patients too need to make careful decisions about their c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cooked meal being the best is changing. Therefore, since most people who are eit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, really, regarding, so, therefore, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96367521368 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7874805885 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476495726496 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7492923005 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.263157895 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6315789474 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285197931207 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949954978296 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639245338572 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179462570129 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267631439164 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.