If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience .
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your postion, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how this examples shape your position
Companies set up different criteria to choose their most preferred candidate. It could be from grades from schools, a smart test for applicants, soft skills, interviews or even a combination of all. If at the end of the day, two applicants are both qualified for the jobs, I do not believe that the applicant with more experience should be chosen for the job. There are several other ways to pick the best, it could be from a test or another interview. It could even be as trivial as deciding based on punctuality. They both need to be given fair chances to compete as they are both qualified.
If all companies decide to employ applicants with more experience at every instance, it may be harmful at the long run. This can cause a situation whereby people remain unemployed due to lack of experience and even never get to have the experience required in the long run. At a point, people would be doing jobs lower than their qualifications or even remain unemployed. The companies might even start lacking in staff due to their rigid requirements. Everyone should’ve given the opportunity to learn on the job either by being attached to a senior colleague and being left to figure it out on their own.
In addition, companies these days even create internship programs where they train graduates to become more employable for them. This training breaks the bias in employment because they become fully skilled after the training. As a result, employing based on experience would not be an option for choosing one out of two qualified candidates. Most people even have the required experience from their institutions. I studied a five year course and had the opportunity to intern with two different construction company for one year which gave me more insight into the practical aspect of my study. This particular training has given me the experience required and more of this experience might mean no additional knowledge.
Also, for a person to have more experience simply means he must have been given the opportunity to learn on the job or even learn from senior colleagues. This is an opportunity that should be given to everyone. It is even possible that the one with less experience will have better work ethics, knowledge and soft skills. How is having more experience even equating to know more. A person might spend 5 years repeating the same thing and getting no additional knowledge while a person with 3 years experience might know more. This makes us how it is decided that a person has more experience. Could it be based on length of previous work done or the quality of previous work done.
Although there are jobs where experience is of high importance such as the construction company. Companies usually look out for experienced employees so as to minimize hazards on site and avoidance of constructing unsafe structures. In this instance, it might be necessary to employ the applicant who is more experienced. This criteria should only apply in few instances where internship opportunities are not opened by the companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... smart test for applicants, soft skills, interviews or even a combination of all....
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng left to figure it out on their own. In addition, companies these days even c...
^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ally look out for experienced employees so as to minimize hazards on site and avoidance ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... the applicant who is more experienced. This criteria should only apply in few insta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, while, as to, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92441860465 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80197106596 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9560790746 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.75 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205972640013 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059243418317 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714089226391 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126616759618 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213472659022 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.