Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. in developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement suggests the scandal has superior function than speaker and reformer. Considering the scandal always attracts our attention quickly; it is common that a scandal is easily spreading throughout the country within a day. Contrary to the speaker and reformer, they stump to propagandize his or her thought. It takes month or even years. Therefore, I agree that the statement that scandal is useful is valid.
Scandal helps problem solve rapidly because population is focusing on it. In order to recognize the validity of this point, it is necessary to consider that for various reasons many people are nosy. They love to discover the secret and discuss it. As a result, the statistic report shows that the tabloid hit its best retail record when they unveil a scandal. When the story is huge enough to call as scandal, the population’s overly inquisitive causes society digging into it. Always there is an example that a reformer spot an issue but the government is not real working on it because of lacking attention. Many society and political issue still remain hitherto. Our people need to oversee our government and the scandal is one of the most effective ways. For example, two years ago in Taiwan, there was a scandal that cram school teacher was sexual harassment on the high school teenager girl student and it result the girl depressed and committed suicide later. Population is astonished by this news and government soon investigates and sets stricter regulation on cram school’s teacher. Entire legislation process only took three months. Scandal can helps further teens free from criminal’s evil attempt. Scandal can also make us focusing on solving problem.
Furthermore, Scandal not only makes entire social focus on this issue for a long time, but also ensures the issue not repetitive in the future. Political issue and society problem need a long-term surveillance even after the problem solved. People are following the issue because scandal makes people emotionally involve. It is hard to forget. Subsequently, A scandal serves as reference for future decision. As the above example, if later the government wants to modify the regulation on cram school to make it looser, one of the lawmaker can raise the past tragedy as a stopper. With the vivid scandal in the past, lawmaker will work more carefully for the future.
On the other hand, the opponent may contend that peeking through other’s private life is not moral and this practice has bad influence on the society. For example, if his or her secret can be discovered, our privacy is as same as open to everyone. Others might constantly watch our private life. While it does impair personal privacy, it isn’t altered it function as attracting the attention. Little bad influence isn’t obscure its merit. Another counter on this point is simply asking that “why you are afraid to be watched?” a candid person don’t have secret that will harm others, but officer might have it. Our well-being is always affected by government officer and great company. Those celebrities’ decisions and behavior are certainly influenced by population’s attention because scandal in the past. Nobody likes to see a deluge of paparazzi in front of your home. Likewise, many surreptitious deal and under table business, which jeopardizes local resident’s life, are afraid of unveiling by tabloid. It is another way to threaten the bad guys. Thus, the power of scandal actually helps to maintain the safety of our welfare.
In summary, I stand for the statement that scandal is useful. The negative meaning of scandal brings positive result to our life. Although it damages a bit on privacy issue, it is able to attract our attention of extremely large audience. They not only help we spot and solve the problem, but also oversight the celebrity on certain scale. Scandal is useful and the most effective way to attract attention than speaker and reformer.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 16
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. in developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...isitive causes society digging into it. Always there is an example that a reformer spo...
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: MANY_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun society seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many societies'.
Suggestion: Many societies
...ing on it because of lacking attention. Many society and political issue still remain hither...
Line 3, column 918, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'results'?
...igh school teenager girl student and it result the girl depressed and committed suicid...
Line 3, column 1167, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
...ess only took three months. Scandal can helps further teens free from criminal's...
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'functions'?
...sonal privacy, it isn't altered it function as attracting the attention. Little bad...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3348.0 2235.4752809 150% => OK
No of words: 648.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04537849152 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80418008087 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 333.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1055.7 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 42.0 20.2370786517 208% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0924638172 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7142857143 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54761904762 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202632884935 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461961280894 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379892478404 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117404000415 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290723616355 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 100.480337079 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.