In the age of internet, the social media is in the heiday. The power of social medias affects not only the public but also the celebrities by the exposure news, which are in high frequency in various fields all over the world. At the same time, it comes controversies that whether the scandals is a beneficial power to supervise celebrities. From many evidences, we can see, in order to make scandals cntribute to ameliorate the social environment, it should be constrained in a modest range.
The quantity and quality of scandals is the important effect determining factor. In this information era, everyone suffers from excessive informations, resulting in the insensibility of the general public. Therefore the quantity and quality of the scandal in this information overflow age are the key indicator of it's effect. According to a survey conducted in China by HZNU, 70% of students are insensive to the scandals of actors and actresses, which can be interpreted as the result of excessive amount of scandals in the entertainment industry. However, nearly 90% of students expressed their concern about a recently political scandal, which are rare and impactful to the public. Additionally, over exposures cause mutual harm to the public and the celebrities. The public could become dumb to those new which is hard to verify and celebrities suffer from the feeling of having no privacy. Therefore, scandals are contributing as long as it is limited within certain quantity and guaranteed with its truthfulness.
The effect of scandals also depends on its field. In some fields, the scandals could produce positive effects while in certain fields, the release of scandals could be a calamity. For instance, the watergate event in which the president Nixon was accused of wiretapping his opponents results in the first resignation of a U.S. Presidents. The following investigation reveals a considerable number of dark side of the USA politic at that time, which greatly ameliorated the conprehensive political environment. The scandal in charity fields, however, could result in a series of negative, even life risking effects. In China, the scandal about the red cross association years ago caused unexpected consequence lasting for several years, which including the general shortage of the blood in developed area. The public tend to refuse to donate blood for the worries of AIDS. Therefore the blood become increasingly expensive in those cities, risking of patients who is in badly need blood but poor. Therefore, the effect of scandal largely depends on the particular fields of it.
Finally, under no circumstance should the scandal is faked. Those scandals would stain the neutrality of medias and incur criticisms. For long time, the journalist are refered as the representation of neutrality and justice by uncovering the truth to the public. The scandal, however, is in the grey zone of news. Most scandals are release without the permission from people involved in. The methods of investigating likewise varies from legal investigation to hidden photograph taking. Those methods and their conductors should not be blamed of as long as it is legal. However, to catch people's eyes, some reporter fake the scandals in order to gain fame, which is unforgiveable for they had crossed the essential of a journalist: to reveal the truth. The faked scandal, although it would be eye-catching, would spoil the credit of the whole social media. To sum up. the truthfulness is also the determining factor to the effect of scandals.
To sum up, whether the scandal can be useful should be estimated from different aspect including its fields, quality and quantity and truthfulness. The scandal, or the exposure is an intrinstic part of achieving justice and fair of human society in the age of information, as long as it is limited in a modest range.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evidences, we can see, in order to make scandals cntribute to ameliorate the soc...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
..., resulting in the insensibility of the general public. Therefore the quantity and quality of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he insensibility of the general public. Therefore the quantity and quality of the scandal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to a survey conducted in China by HZNU, 70% of students are insensive to the sca...
^^
Line 6, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roduce positive effects while in certain fields, the release of scandals could be...
^^
Line 6, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igation reveals a considerable number of dark side of the USA politic at that tim...
^^
Line 6, column 875, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...o donate blood for the worries of AIDS. Therefore the blood become increasingly expensive...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 941, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increasingly expensive in those cities, risking of patients who is in badly need...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 103.0 58.6224719101 176% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3256.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 625.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2096 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95819361097 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1020.6 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 19.0 4.99550561798 380% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.728176632 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7647058824 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3823529412 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79411764706 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 24.0 5.13820224719 467% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155807161809 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386293466633 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315297121644 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909697199272 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237208674957 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 100.480337079 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.