Scandals Are Useful Because They Focus Our Attention On Problems In Ways That No Speaker Or Reformer Ever Could.
The author of the issue states that scandals may be fruitful, on the contrary of the fact that the majority repudiate it since he is of the opinion that it might be effective than reformers and speakers’ attempts in diverting the people’s attention into the problems. Although a superficial inspection reveals that scandals could be effective regarding that, it could bring about the reduction of corruptions and bribes in a society, as far as I am concerned it could not be efficacious in one way or another. After elaborating the point regarding of its effectiveness, I will address scandal’s inefficacy and even going so far as to conclude that scandals could be detrimental in some ways.
To begin with, I would affirm that scandals could thrust the politicians and higher-ups in the top of the organizational chart through the low-level subordinates, abstain from giving bribes. In other words, it may occasion to dwindle the rate of corporate corruption to a high degree. For example, think about a society that has free media. In such a community the fear of scandals give rise to people in the organization do their best in their jobs, and they abstain from committing corruption.
The first reason regarding the scandals inefficacy is that scandals might redirect the people’s attention to the superficial problems instead of an important one. For example, think about the case that a competent individual has been accused of a sex scandal. Although such a scandal is not extolled in nothing if not societies, it does not mean that such an individual has no merit of his place and must resign from his work. Anyone is responsible for his private issues, and such private matters do not necessarily reflect the merit of someone in his place.
Second, frequently exposing scandals might cast a shadow over the society and likely escalate the rate of disaffection throughout the community. For instance, imagine whenever you turn on TV/Radio hear about the scandals. Unconsciously the thought may be sprung to your mind that the government does not deserve managing the society, but it does not necessarily veracious, as you exaggerate the heinousness of the condition in your mind.
The last one but not least reason to censure the author’s assertion is that the ability of a speaker or reformers to redirect people’s attention is commensurate with his/her trustworthiness. If a trustworthy character like Mahatma Gundy is considered, we should say that the efficacy of such a speaker in directing people’s attention is higher than those scandals which their veracity is under question. To put it in a nutshell, the skeptics in society, who constitute a significant part, does not believe the veracity of scandals easily.
In conclusion, while I acknowledge that the scandals may eventually lead to some progress in our society in one way, they are not useful in some many ways and its effectiveness in comparison with trustworthy reformers ability in directing people’s attention is less. To sum up, to achieve real progress in social development, we need better education to increase people’s awareness of their rights and their sense of justice. _522 words
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scandals'' or 'scandal's'?
Suggestion: scandals'; scandal's
...ption. The first reason regarding the scandals inefficacy is that scandals might redir...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: NOT_NOTHING[1]
Message: Double negation. You probably should say 'anything'.
Suggestion: anything
...hough such a scandal is not extolled in nothing if not societies, it does not mean that...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to manage'.
Suggestion: to manage
...nd that the government does not deserve managing the society, but it does not necessaril...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...dition in your mind. The last one but not least reason to censure the author's ass...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reformers'' or 'reformer's'?
Suggestion: reformers'; reformer's
...tiveness in comparison with trustworthy reformers ability in directing people's atte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir rights and their sense of justice. _522 words
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18653846154 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13063161198 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501923076923 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1999083577 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.947368421 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3684210526 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232958978886 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595966147624 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605678046586 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108733148364 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524070845044 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.