Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
There is no system built perfectly and impenetrable or can't manipulated by selfish people. Therefore, continuous reforms are necessary to make any system protected from scandals and misuse whether it is the constitution of nation or law of any private company. In any system scandals show us loopholes present in that particular system in more practical and possible way than any speaker or reformer can.
Scandals reveal lapses in system that can be used for bad activities. Historically there has been lots of scandals happening in various fields from sports to law of any country. One example can be considered as in cricket controversy of spot fixing scandals lead to more stringent laws for players then earlier to avoid denigration of cricket in the world.
In 2012 the 2G spectrum scam in India showed flaws in country's telecom and IT laws. From various scandals happening historically have shown us discrepancy in system and warned us about it for misuse. Scandals or Big controversies expose weaknesses in laws and legislatures which need reforms. They help us to reform in more effective way with quickness.
Though, scandals often guide us to reforms simultaneously we also have to constantly try focussing on the main problems for loopholes. Speaker or reformer often drive us in more of theoretical approach of reformer with intention of covering all loopholes from which light can pass. It is also effective way as initially when any law is introduced, it has to pass through the scrutiny of various reformers as same happen when passing any law in upper and lower house of parliament of any country.
Hence, Scandal can lead us to the main problems of it occurence. It is also necessary for reformers to find the main problems that can cause scandal. In this way we can best assure any system to be more efficient and fair in function.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tem built perfectly and impenetrable or cant manipulated by selfish people. Therefor...
^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the constitution of nation or law of any private company. In any system scandals ...
^^
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e way than any speaker or reformer can. Scandals reveal lapses in system that ca...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, so, then, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99035369775 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82378461936 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51768488746 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7364264658 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18933600791 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740801180943 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045035622982 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115722974155 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233440612115 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.