Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Due to the advancement of technology, the Internet and specifically social media, spreading scandals are rapidly increased. People use these websites or applications to share their news. Some claim these scandals and spreading in the society would be beneficial, while some believe it has several disadvantages for the society. I mostly agree with the latter one and I will explain my reasons.
First of all, most of scandals are proposed false information and these can destroy the face of celeberities, sportmen or officials. Thus, these people should waste their time and money to show the scandals are wrong whereas they could spend these time and money on better purposes. For example, George Cloney, one of the famous actor in the Hollywood, faced scandals that accused him sexual abuse of his colleague. He had to lay off his job for one year because no director wanted to work with him while before this scandal he always had some proposed jobs. He spent about a year for following it in the court and finally, the court result showed he was not guilty.
Moreover, the origin of the scandals are unknown. Any people could concoct a scandal and due to his power in social media, he could spread his scandal. Thus, some companies, organizations or even newspapers abuse of this ability and try to sell their products or guide public opinions. For example, in COVID-19 pandemic period, a scandal spreaded in Iran that Remesiders, a medicene, could remedy the disease completely. People started to buy stock of producers of this product in Iran. After about a week, The share of these companies increase twice and the news showed that it is just complementary effect on the disease not complete remedy. It seems somebody tried to take advantages of the situation and gain money by selling thier share on high prices.
On the other hand, some maintain that in the dictatorship society, there is not any way to demonstrate the currptions of the governers. Because they force newspapers and news agencies to propogate the news that only support their ideas. In this situation scandals can help individuals to share their news about governers. So, they can freely spread their news via social media without fear of jail because it is difficult for the goverment to find out the origin of the news.
In conclusion, although scandals may have some benefits in special situations, I reckon it mostly has disadvanteges like destroy the fame of celeberities or governers while the proposed inforamtion would not be right.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the scandals') or simply say ''most scandals''.
Suggestion: most of the scandals; most scandals
...will explain my reasons. First of all, most of scandals are proposed false information and thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98812351544 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67858516152 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522565320665 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4823191724 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0476190476 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110073135207 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341014031996 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252051606335 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633620070095 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172041403931 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.