Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Reputation, a trait that most humans do live on but unaware of, is often protected carefully by covering the risky demeanors of themselves. It is bombarded into pieces however, once a scandal is being discovered. People may argue that what role do scandals play besides a topic in chats, while I regard it as examples for us to investigate and discuss relevant problems.
Scandals exist in miscellaneous aspects, from bribery of presidents to a husband cheating on a wife, but what they present in common are real, genuine scenarios for us to think deeper. Few years ago, a food company was reported selling oil that actually originated from food waste, and furthermore sold to an abundant of downstream companies and restaurants followed by multiple purifying processes, in order to increase its profits. Besides discussing how evil the CEO of the company is, we can overlook the responsibility of an enterprise, and its influences to the public among pursuing its perculinary goals. It aroused people’s attention to social responsibility and honesty, also to be alert and suspicious, which had been transcribed in textbooks but never being underlined. The example is a imperative rationale to assess the usefulness of scandals.
Some may argue that, most of the scandals are not irrelevant to ourselves, such as the relationships between celebrities, and that paying attention to those information does not strike a positive impact to the society. However, I interpret this as a mistaken perspective toward scandals. The essential of scandal itself is an opportunity to revise our attitude towards living, and the fundamental basis of interactions with others. For instance, we often heard two married pop stars getting divorced after a short marriage. Besides guessing what is the cause of the breakup and the future lawsuits, we can focus on topics like what comprises marriage, or what is the essential of a relationship. It is a great source for us to question ourselves, get a more elucidated answer and furthermore avoid trapping into the same situations.
Scandals are somewhat trepidations for most humans, and others may even despise scandal itself as an irrelevant product under society. Nevertheless, I accolade it to be useful to focus ourselves into problems. It is the best reminder for everyone to inspect themselves, and a potent discourse that speakers or reformers could not address.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... never being underlined. The example is a imperative rationale to assess the usef...
^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...the usefulness of scandals. Some may argue that, most of the scandals are not irre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...lebrities, and that paying attention to those information does not strike a positive impact to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26165803109 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07648241015 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598445595855 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0316409074 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.470588235 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138434168465 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414910768373 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392316928295 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852593995487 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535576397203 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.