Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Usually humans tend to solve a problem that has been found rather than preventing it from occurring. The issue stated above tries to convey a similar meaning. This is affirmatively certain because there are no certain ways to predict the arousal of problems in order to prevent them from occurring. Although, people may challenge this claim by delineating that most of the scandals indicate that a particular problem has reached its apex before it is eliminated. Also people may also proclaim that human tendency also include forgetfulness such that people tend to withdraw the preventive measures once the scandals are resolved. These are some very strong arguments that may tend to weaken the statement given, but there are more compelling facts that overpower these claims.
First of all, a problem can be dealt with only if its existence is discovered. In a quotidian fashion, it can also be stated that an ailment is cured only when its existence is determined. As evident from the history of mankind, every medicine that has been found till date is found because of the existence of a disease. So it can certainly be accepted that scandals plays the role of disease through which medicine which is the solution can be brought into action. So the claim that scandals might have already worsened the problem is weakened because the solution mainly tries to prevent the future recurrence of the problem rather than taking responsible for previous mistakes.
Secondarily, we have to scrutinize the fact that all the reformers and speakers are ultimately humans. They are not expected to predict which problem might turn into a catastrophe. Actually, there are no definite methods to prescience and assert that these problems might lead to a scandal affecting millions of people. But it must be enforced to follow certain disciplinary regulations that tend to minimize any kind of scandal that might arise. For instance, in Paris on 2015 a major terrorist attack took place that shook the entire world. The government instead of getting succumbed to the terrors, arose against the odds by preinstalling security forces before the terror attacks as a preventive measure.
In addition, one of the major scandal that happened in Asia was the 2G scandal in India. It was after this scandal that the government tend to realise that politicians must be limited powers in certain aspects and to eradicate bribery. Based on this scandal a revolutionary demonetization was brought about and many corrupt politicians were castigated. The other claim that people tend to forget the problem once the scandal is resolved can be tackled with a counterargument. The people might indeed forget a problem once dealt with, but the law must not. Various effective laws must be brought into force in order to prevent the problem as we know the impact that it can have.
In summary, it is evident that a scandal tends to emphasize the loopholes in the laws and it even serves as a medium to rectify the problem by tracing back the origin of the scandal. All these are not possible from a mere reformation speech from a speaker or a reformer as he will not be in a position to clearly elucidate all the impacts and preventive measures of the problem. A practical experience is always more effective rather than a theoretical thesis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n order to prevent them from occurring. Although, people may challenge this claim by del...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ached its apex before it is eliminated. Also people may also proclaim that human ten...
^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a quotidian fashion" with adverb for "quotidian"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...th only if its existence is discovered. In a quotidian fashion, it can also be stated that an ailment ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for instance, in addition, in summary, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2769.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 555.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98918918919 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85370353223 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7203364683 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477477477477 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 881.1 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9618232202 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3461538462 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19230769231 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190466234643 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539578002074 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423196255756 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111151749481 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270667325632 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.