Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Science and technology are developing faster than at any other time in history. But I don't think it is able to solve all the problems of the world. So, I strongly disagree with the prompt. Science and technology will not be able to solve all of society's problems. I think in this way because of three reasons.
First of all, as science and thecnology is solving many problems, it's also bringing more problems with it's solutions. For example, personal computer for a child is very helpful to widen the child's knowledge. But at the same time, most of the children are getting addicted to computer, wasting a lot of time in social media, gaming, and watching videos. Nuclear energy is a great solution to the energy scarcity of the world, but at the same time, it is a great threat as it made the modern warfare more deadly. Industry is harming the environment. So, if we think science and technology is able to solve everything, we are being fooled by ourselves. We can clearly see from the example that science and technology is only making our life easier, not solving everything.
Socond of all, there many problems, which has nothing to do with science. Human being is a very complex thing, especially its brain. Interpersonal relationships, hate, love, and other emotions are roots to many problems. An example for this idea could be the notion that we cannot moodify one's thoughts even he or she has diabolical thoughts. Ethics doesn't allow us to modify someone's personality and thoughts. So, there are many problems where we won't allow science to modify them. That's why some problem's will always remain as a problem because of our emotions. If science wants to interfere with these, the thing will be another new problem itself as we are compromising ethics.
As science are discovering more things, the more details are being discovered. Is there really an end to this? I don't see any possibilty. Scientists never knew the effect of trans fat in the body until recently, when they became able to observe the reactions that are made by those molecules. Before then, trans fat was considered just as a fat. It was considered equally harmful to the body as other fats, when consumed in a large quantity. So, how would we know that we have discovered the deepest knoledge of the universe to feel the content of solving all the problems possible to arise in the society? The answer clearly is, we never will be able.
Some people would still argue that, science is solving almost everything, but does that verify the prompt? We can clearly see with the discussion that science is not being able to solve 'all problems' of the socitey. Thus, science and thechnology never will be able to solve all the problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...han at any other time in history. But I dont think it is able to solve all the probl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nd thecnology is solving many problems, its also bringing more problems with its so...
^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ld be the notion that we cannot moodify ones thoughts even he or she has diabolical ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... or she has diabolical thoughts. Ethics doesnt allow us to modify someones personality...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e we wont allow science to modify them. Thats why some problems will always remain as...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ered. Is there really an end to this? I dont see any possibilty. Scientists never k...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, so, still, then, thus, for example, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76694915254 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54383785476 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495762711864 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0598413627 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5806451613 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2258064516 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8064516129 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26502715268 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726480435343 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761873279411 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177507837528 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751367413602 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.