Rembrandt was a famous artist
Both the passage and the lecture discusses about whether the famous art known as 'Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet' can or cannot be identified as a work by Rembrandt. The passage discusses three reasons why it is not a work by Rembrandt, but the lecture opposes all three claims.
First, the passage claims that there is an incosistency in the dress of the women which is an unusual mistake for a fastidious painter like Rembrandt. The hat worn by the woman was a servent's hat. But she is also wearing an expensive fur collar. But the lecturer presents findings of a recent study where it was proved that the collar was painted after more than 100 years later by someone else to increase its value by presenting it as a aristrocrat woman's portrait. So, as without the fur collar, the painting is actually consistent.
Second, the passage suggests that the work of light and shadow is also inconsistent because the light was coming from below and the face was illuminated, though the dark color collar should absorb the light and the face should have some shadow. However, the lecturer argues that as the actual painting had not have the collar and wearing a light color dress, the face being illuminated is also usual. So, the actual painting contains the usual light and shadow work of Rembrandt.
Third reason the passage presents is that the it was painted on more than one piece of wood glued together, which Rembrandt never did. In the lecture, it was claimed that the research shows that the original painting was on one piece of wood, and the other pieces were added later to look it grand and more valuable. Even the original piece of wood was from the same tree Rembrandt used for one of his own portrait. So, it can be attributed to him.
With all these new information from a research, the lecturer opposes the passage's claim and argues that the painting was actullay painted by Rembrandt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... increase its value by presenting it as a aristrocrat womans portrait. So, as wit...
^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ues that as the actual painting had not have the collar and wearing a light color dr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ird reason the passage presents is that the it was painted on more than one piece of w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69822485207 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41837439516 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488165680473 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7871182825 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23639524001 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800532857888 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541951489227 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133406766435 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311248377271 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.