Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact,' almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future."
Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your viewpoint, consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true.
Unarguably, scientific theories are the main drive for the development of mankind.Regarding the irrsolute nature of science, some people opine that theories must be looked at skeptically,while others claim the reverse. In my opinion, due to developing nature of every field of science science, taking every theory as incomplete can ensure further progress in that society.
Admitedly, not every breakthrough in science and theory is immune to mistake or faults.through history, many widely believed fact have turned to be misleading,such as the theory that planet earth is the center of universe. By being optimistic about every new theory, the need for searching for extensive research is precluded and therefore, the knowledge of humankind becomes stagnated.Furtermore, preserving a certain level of skepticism toward every theory can inspire the scientist and researcher of societies and help to invigorate and vitalize academic status of universitis by triggering the scientists to look for more comprehensive definitions and breakthroughs.
having said that, it is sometime irresonable to doubt every facet of knowledge and latest theories.To illustrate, in the field of space exploration, every new theory is achieved through meticuolus studies of massive number of scientists as well as tremendous effort for exploring space through newest crafts.Pessimism toward the achievemt of these scientists may be discouraging and lead to weakening of their morale. On the other hand, repeling every new breakthugh by people can provoke havoc in the society by fracturing peole into different groups, in which some advocate and some propose the achievements. therefore, skeptisicm toward theories must be controlled by the governmenst in order to ensure a healthy state of the mind for both researchers and people. Furtermore, not every theory turns to be inaccurate, depending of the validity of the scientific surveys sevral of them can be trusted especially in the field of medical theories which can grant remedy of strange diseases.
In summary,every theory is achieved through assiduous work of theoreticians, but to be optimistic over every theory is over simplistic. certain level of disagreement is essential for the growth of science as well as prosperity of humanbeing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Regarding
...in drive for the development of mankind.Regarding the irrsolute nature of science, some p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , while
...t theories must be looked at skeptically,while others claim the reverse. In my opinion...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: science
... to developing nature of every field of science science, taking every theory as incomplete can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , such
...lieved fact have turned to be misleading,such as the theory that planet earth is the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furtermore
...nowledge of humankind becomes stagnated.Furtermore, preserving a certain level of skeptici...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...nsive definitions and breakthroughs. having said that, it is sometime irresonable t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... facet of knowledge and latest theories.To illustrate, in the field of space explo...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pessimism
...r exploring space through newest crafts.Pessimism toward the achievemt of these scientist...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...cate and some propose the achievements. therefore, skeptisicm toward theories must be con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , every
...emedy of strange diseases. In summary,every theory is achieved through assiduous wo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Certain
...c over every theory is over simplistic. certain level of disagreement is essential for ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61271676301 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37038833442 2.79657885939 121% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552023121387 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.481687967 60.3974514979 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.2 118.986275619 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 23.4991977007 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4 5.21951772744 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093452294883 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434091698064 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262589160352 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610676903627 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217458915843 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 14.1392134831 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.05 48.8420337079 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.85 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.