Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact,' almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.
Science is a study of phenomena that surround us. The logical trail of deriving theories based on the predictions and experiments has defined Science for as long as we know. However, these theories are often misconstrued as "facts" and are consumed by society obsequiously. Considering the fact that the basis of these theories involves predicting a plausible explanation for a bunch of observations, it lends itself much less gravitas. Hence, it is imperative to be sceptic of such "Factual" scientific information and ask the right questions.
Curiosity is one of the key components in making Science, the way we understand the universe. Scientific theories have always been questioned and that is what makes science, a progressive and continuously developing field. For example, after Issac Newton described light as being made of particles called photons, for a long time the scientific community assumed it as being the end of how we understand light. Until, the great physicist, Max Planck via his double-slit light experiment uncovered the nature of light as a wave and opened a whole new dimension of quantum mechanics.
This is a classic example of gauging how the brightest minds of all times, Issac Newton's perception was held under the lens to discover a path-breaking understanding of light.
Often scientific theories being considered as the ultimate facts are due to the lack of better insights or limited vision or lack of scientific ways to prove it. For example, for
centuries, it was considered that earth is flat until the revelation of the fact that it is, in fact, spherical and the fact that atom is the smallest particle to exist until right experimental conditions were developed to realise that atom constitutes of electrons and protons.
Thus, considering scientific discovering as mere facts are limiting the ways we understand the universe. Science is about exploring all possibilities and scrutinising everything that comes out of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...ons were developed to realise that atom constitutes of electrons and protons. Thus, conside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33968253968 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22623723584 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9557651487 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114143528946 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389226619551 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413291097548 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591149779814 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325858387289 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.