society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents
The author of the statement stated that society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents. Many will argue that it will hold all the time, while others will counter the claim by providing examples. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
The goal of a society should be providing equal opportunities to every individual despite their religion, caste, color. Some individual are talent by birth, while some make themselves skillful by working hard, for example in the game of soccer, people consider Messi as a natural talent player but they don't consider Ronaldo as a natural talent because he developed his own skill, but both are the top icon of the soccer game. So, Everyone in society should get equal opportunities otherwise, society may have loose their future star.
There is no denying the fact that children who have special talents should get trained in order to develop their talent. However, it is an issue needed to discuss whether to start training at an early age. First, some talent may not reveal at an early age. It is not impossible and reasonable for parents to push children to learn when they are too young. Some parents are eager to make their children learn all kinds of talents and developed into a genius in a certain field one day. But the oppression did nothing but make students unhappy and depressed. I suggest parents could patiently wait and see. If children show their talent at an early age, it is a fortune to help them develop properly. While do not push them when they are too young. To make their talents more contributive and influential, parents and the whole society should pay more money and energy to help them.
In Sum, we can say that talented children should be provided training and they should definitely get a chance to show their talent, but equal opportunities must be given to other children also. And Parent should not force or pressurize their children to learn when they are too young.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ssi as a natural talent player but they dont consider Ronaldo as a natural talent be...
^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...portunities otherwise, society may have loose their future star. There is no den...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 700, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... fortune to help them develop properly. While do not push them when they are too youn...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 189, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...unities must be given to other children also. And Parent should not force or pressur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83746556474 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39583278272 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9421531845 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.613755040337 0.243740707755 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195176359663 0.0831039109588 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198809828331 0.0758088955206 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356832760691 0.150359130593 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11798790689 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.