Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The author claim that the educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing those course in which they are likely not to succeed. Many of us will argue that it will hold all the time while others will counter this by providing examples. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning
for the same.
Educational institutes are the place where the future generation of the country is being carved. They are the temple of education that make a difference in the life of students. Students attend the school colleges in order to pursue those courses which they have dreamt of. So, it will not be okay if the institutes start dissuading the students from pursuing their favorite subject or fields in which they want to make their career just because, they are less likely to succeed in these areas.
The colleges or institutes can counsel the student in order to select the better field option or help them figure out what they should do in their life. It will be more beneficial to the student then just stopping them to pursue. By doing this they are not only helping the student to understand their talent or interest in the field, but also providing them future in which they are likely to succeed.
Moreover, by stoping them to pursue what they want to pursue, the institutes will discourage the student and that will affect them negatively. They can indulge in some illegal activities which will ruin their career as well as life. So, institutes must be very careful while dissuading any student. They should at least provide a chance to them to see whether is it okay for them or not.
However, In some of the case, the author claim seems to be correct, for example, if a student is trying to crack some exam like say civil service exams and even after several attempts he was not able to get through it then he should be dissuaded from pursuing this field. So, in this sort of case, the author's claim is justifiable.
In sum, we can say that it will wrong if students are getting dissuading from the institute to pursue their field of interest just because they are less like to succeed. In some case as mention above the author's claim is justifiable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ment and will provide sound reasoning for the same. Educational institutes a...
^^^
Line 15, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y are likely to succeed. Moreover, by stoping them to pursue what they want...
^^
Line 19, column 13, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... okay for them or not. However, In some of the case, the author claim seems to be corr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, at least, for example, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73979591837 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36270078688 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.248456769 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37403775595 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135590877094 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124307829088 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225432882445 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950625302351 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.