Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The prompt urges for the society to take necessary steps to identify children; having special talents and work on them at an early age to develop their talents. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "absolutely agree" with the given statement and hereby obliged to provide proper elaboration of my points in defense of my position.
To begin with - the aphorism that, today's children will be the leaders of the future. It implies that the welfare of a society and in more cosmopolitan way, the betterment of the future world largely depend on the upbringing of today's children. In order to nurture these children it is very important to identy them with their latent talents. It can be seen from earlier times that, an individual can not be good at everything. So, it is very important for a child as well as for the society to provide him or her with necessary exposure to find out his or her hidden talent. Once they sort it out then they should work on the child to flourish that talent. Now coming to the point why it is important and specially why it is the resposibility of a society to do it for the children. For instance - a child may be very good at singing but not that much in study. So, if the proclivity of that child towards singing is spotted and the society works on him or her; providing various platforms to perform, to encourage him or her and thereby to hone his or her talent to turn it into a skill. Saying that, proper care should also be given to his fundamental needs apart from giving training. If this kind of kids are taken proper care then they stand good chance to be an asset for the society.
Coming to the second point, why it is the resposibility of the society, not the family or not any certain individual? First of all, we need to be very clear of the term "society" whioch includes the authority, the guardians and also the residents of the society, not only the higher authority or the law makers. Saying that - it is a vast responsibility for just the authority or the decision makers of a society to check out the children of it and nurture them. Personal efforts and necessary facilities are to provided by the guardians of the children. Informing to the authority, they will make certain arrangements for the training of the children. In succinct, the locals should be vigilant enough to spot out the latent talent of their future leader and let the authority to work according it scheme in order to develop the talent of those children.
However, if the work is not properly done, meaning - the society only identifies the children with special talents but does not act accordingly to increase or develop those talent, then it will not upshot a great result. It can be easily seen that many talents such as - many champions of various reality shows, many athelets of various sports and many special talents, proven their worth but got lost in the darkness because of being devoid of proper tracks to follow. If those children are not shown proepr ways to turn their talent into a skill then such efforts of identifying special talented children will be of no use. Without proper actions and trainings, yes they might come forward somehow but will fail to sustain their speciality for a longer period of time.
So, looking at overall points mentioned above and with respect to various circumstances, it should be one of the prime responsibilities of a society to upbring the natural and special talents of kids and provide necessary facilities and trainings to nurture those talents in order to make them valuable for the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to find out his or her hidden talent. Once they sort it out then they should work ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 810, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'schemes'?
Suggestion: schemes
... let the authority to work according it scheme in order to develop the talent of those...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this talent' or 'those talents'?
Suggestion: this talent; those talents
... act accordingly to increase or develop those talent, then it will not upshot a great result...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eing devoid of proper tracks to follow. If those children are not shown proepr way...
^^
Line 7, column 756, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...o sustain their speciality for a longer period of time. So, looking at overall points menti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, well, apart from, as for, for instance, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2974.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 633.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69826224329 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01592376844 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66218037175 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429699842022 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 927.9 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1900500263 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.79166666667 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313028767402 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979018748419 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822976522114 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212173951951 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411747198623 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.