Having an exceptional talent for certain things from birth is a god gift and very few children are blessed by such gitfs. The prompt recommends that such precocious children be identified and prepared from an early age to develop their talents. Undoubtedly, the recommendation of the prompt is justified for the following reasons that are as discussed below.
To begin with, most contributions in various fields from science to arts are given by people of natural talent, from Mozart to Einstein all had shown signs of being exceptional from an early age. Idenitifying and nurturing these children for their talents will surely let them achieve their peak potentials and give us many more Mozarts and Einsteins who will contribute to society in significant ways. Edison was discovered to be a precocious child at an early age by his headmaster. So, the headmaster arranged special clases for Edison at school where he could learn advance math and physics while has peers were still learning addition. Eventually, Edison completed his school at an early age and then joined the famous Louie de Phillipe physics institute where he went on make important inventions like the telephone and light bulb.
Secondly, many such children who are not identified are left behind and are never able to recognise their natural talents as with normal instruction they are forced to abondon their talents and mould themselves to meet the expectations of society. The sheer loss of potential Einsteins and Edisons this was is purely catastrophic not only to for children themselves but also for the society. Had more children been identified at early ages we would have been colonising planets by now. Sadly, such prudence is rarely found at academicians who are obsessed with academics of childrens and disregard their talents. Had Edison been also left out and forced to take up instruction normally just as his peers were taking up, it would be not too far fetched to claim that we still would be lighting candles at night.
The argument that providing children of natural talent with training from an early age is stealing their childhood from them is convieniently put up by opponents of the recommendation. Though when we consider that these children are born into these talents would better off enhancing their skills rather than having issues adjusting with their peers the argument falls apart. Being having naturally augmented abilties as compared to their peers these children would become misfits and in worst cases might even would have to face bullying. It was concluded from the results of a survey conducted my Miranda institute that children that were born with natural talents had troubles adjusting with their peers and were more likely to face bullying at school from peers and will be ignored by teahcer's as they would not know how to deal with them appropriately.
In conclusion, we can say that providing children with natural talent appropriate training is not only for the greater good of the society but would also benefit them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to advance'
Suggestion: to advance
...r Edison at school where he could learn advance math and physics while has peers were s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons like the telephone and light bulb. Secondly, many such children who are not...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll would be lighting candles at night. The argument that providing children of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... up by opponents of the recommendation. Though when we consider that these children ar...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 608, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Miranda) must be used with a third-person verb: 'institutes'.
Suggestion: institutes
...esults of a survey conducted my Miranda institute that children that were born with natur...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2549.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0878243513 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64100746281 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8293254504 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.611111111 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311876120606 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116535412969 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054847134986 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198122416563 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169157963641 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.