Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Some people suggest that the society should try to protect endangered animals only if human activities cause potential extinction. Although the above statement seems to be logical at first glance, I believe that the government and associated organizations should spare no effort to save all sepcies in their countries rather than selecting only some of those animals hurted by human related tasks.
Firstly, it is quite difficult and tough for biologists and other researchers to identify the primary cause of the damage for some kinds of species, since the human activities do make onmipresent influence on our environment. If we cannot ensure whether the negative factors are from unhuman change or human activities, it is unreliable to decide which animals deserve our assistance and perseverence. An appropriate example cannot be far away: A great number of fishes disappear in the south ocean of China. Some scientist argue that the oversell of fish leads to the condition of underwater animals, but others believe that the regular climate change should be blamed.
Furthermore, each animal is the unique part of the life chain, therefore, it is significant to give our helping hand to save all the endangered species. Otherwise, the extinction of any animal would cause the irrepirable results for unknown potential value, since many species have mysterious effects on our environment, but our scientists did not belie all the information and knowledge in terms of those species.
Additionally, before making any decision to protect endangered animals, we should entirely investigate the financial cost and the value of each specie in terms of environment. By doing so, we can efficiently make a tradeoff between the variety of specie and financial consumption.
Overall, I suppose that we should protect all the species fallen into the danger of extinction whether the negative effects from human activities or not, becasue all species are the distinctive part of our nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 524, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...he south ocean of China. Some scientist argue that the oversell of fish leads to the ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ean of China. Some scientist argue that the oversell of fish leads to the condition of under...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, i suppose
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34076433121 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86992862701 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9401259739 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.454545455 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222008468523 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835678224514 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519961859345 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124099906029 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031429844447 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.