Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

Essay topics:

Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Exticntion of an organism from ecosystem can have devastating effects on the embient environment. Majority of endangered animal are on the brink of extinction due to destruction of their natural habitat. Frequently, human beings, directly or indirectly, are responsible for the extinction of species. To maintain the balance in the ecosytem and for sightinn the of an endangered organism by our future generation, society should save endangered animals.
When an animal from food chain becomes extinct, it breaks havoc in the envicronment. Extinction of one species creates an upheaval and affects livelihood of many other organism in the food chain. For instance, if on certain island there is a herbivore which feeds on a particular type of grass. Extinction of this particular type of grass would cause the death of herbivore by starvation. Reduction in number of herbivore would reduce the number of carnivore which eat that particular herbivoe. In this way, a series of even would take place and create imbalance in the ecosystem. These imbalance in ecosystem can obliquely impact the human beings too. Therefore, it becomes necessary to save the endangered animals.
If certain species becomes extinct our future generation will not be able to see them in their natural habitat. As a result of extinction, our future generation won;t get the opportunity to see those animals.
Preserving an endangered animal species requires considerable effort and money. This investment can be curtailed by researching the methods to increase the reproduction. But this effort is worthwhile because it will save the lives of precious animal and restore the balance in the environment.
In conclusion, Society should make efforts to save the endangered animals regardless of whether extinction is result of human activity or not, so as to prevent any catastrophic situtation that may be engendered by extinction of an animal and to preserve the animal for the future generations to see.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this imbalance' or 'These imbalances'?
Suggestion: This imbalance; These imbalances
... and create imbalance in the ecosystem. These imbalance in ecosystem can obliquely impact the h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 717, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cessary to save the endangered animals. If certain species becomes extinct our fut...
^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ion is result of human activity or not, so as to prevent any catastrophic situtation tha...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33226837061 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03049248444 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504792332268 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0555247256 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7222222222 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206817995549 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637831761095 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482668902371 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119625411376 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364634422844 0.0667264976115 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.