For a society to truly flourish, dissent should be encouraged.
Most of the countries among the world are under developing. Few people argue that, development among the nations takes place only when the needs of people were listed. Moreover, the issues faced by majority citizens also should be listed and wighted issues to be resolve in a fast pace. While others argue that, considering numerous advices might trouble the decission makers to take a stand on their words. I personally agree with this view that, the dovelopment happens when the law makers discuss pros and cons about the specific proposals make by experts.
Discussing the pros and cons about the issues might help the law makers to decide wheather to approve the respected project or not. If needed they suggest few changes in the plan to make it better. For instance,at the time of USA's national policy on medical issurance were introduced, President Mr. Barak Obama, proposed his view to financial experts of the country to check the possibility of the schceme. After making numerous changes in the scheme by experts teams from finance department of USA, this scheme was approved by the parliment. Under this scheme millions of immigrants and infants were benifited with medical kits.
On the other hand, some argue that by considering various opinions the plans theme may change and benifits may not reach people in time. They argue that, corrupted enterprenuers whose moto is to make money may suggest some points which indirectly makes profits to their companies.
In conclusion,there are more benifits when the issues were discussed while creating a development scheme in any independent nation. Thus, pros outweighted cons and the discussion should be make among the nations on their developing projects and the government should consider the common man's suggestions too while approving any development scheme.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment happens when the law makers discuss pros and cons about the specific propos...
^^
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iscuss pros and cons about the specific proposals make by experts. Discussi...
^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o approve the respected project or not. If needed they suggest few changes in the ...
^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...the plan to make it better. For instance,at the time of USAs national policy on med...
^^^
Line 6, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plans'' or 'plan's'?
Suggestion: plans'; plan's
...hat by considering various opinions the plans theme may change and benifits may not r...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...its to their companies. In conclusion,there are more benifits when the issues were ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 190, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'made'?
Suggestion: made
...ghted cons and the discussion should be make among the nations on their developing p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 294.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24149659864 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63203116281 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1218610215 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0627259681864 0.243740707755 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207508441053 0.0831039109588 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444959726331 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0391203352751 0.150359130593 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309549740441 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.