Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc

Essay topics:

Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

When it comes to the issue the main feature for a leader, some people believe that he should be highly competitive. However, others have the opposite view and think that a leader should have the ability to cooperate with others. As far as I am concerned the last point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reasons.

First and the most important reason is that a leader cannot consider all of the aspects of the issue, which he wants to decide about it, while they have much knowledge. In fact, cooperation allows the leader to have others idea, which helps them to take a better decision. I think that a small example can give some light to this matter. It is quite common that a programmer puts a part of the application for getting feedback from users. Indeed, he never can create the application without any mistake, and also refrain this mistake is costly and time-consuming. Nevertheless, users’ feedback let him improve their application easily.

A further point we must consider is that cooperation assists the leader to do many things in short time. It is quite normal that if we trust on others and lets them do part of a project, we can accomplish it in the less time. In addition, cooperation gives the sense of being useful to employees, so they try to increase productivity and quality. In this way, a great leader can not overlook of this effective factor, which is important in the competition-rich environment.

In contrast, the sense of competition stimulates the leader to focus more on his mistakes and try to eliminate them. Moreover, he has more enthusiasm to embrace challenges and cope with the diversity of situations. Overall, he makes more efforts for being success, and for achieve this never be give up, which is essential for a leader. Of course, the leader should notice for being the success in competition he cannot do any things, which can be immoral.

All above evidence supports this fact that cooperation decreases mistakes, increases the employees' efficiency and satisfaction. Admittedly, competition can have some advantages such as make more attempts for being success, while I strongly believe that profits in cooperation are more than that of in competition.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e the ability to cooperate with others. As far as I am concerned the last point ca...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...reason is that a leader cannot consider all of the aspects of the issue, which he wants to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in the competition-rich environment. In contrast, the sense of competition stim...
^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ation decreases mistakes, increases the employees efficiency and satisfaction. Admittedly...
^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'in short', 'of course', 'such as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220657276995 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.154929577465 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.075117370892 0.0880659088768 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446009389671 0.0497285424764 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0610328638498 0.0444667217837 137% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12441314554 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0140845070423 0.0406280797675 35% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.84015649109 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0281690140845 0.030933414821 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00234741784038 0.0016655270985 141% => OK
Determiners: 0.112676056338 0.0997080785238 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0281690140845 0.0249443105267 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0140845070423 0.0148568991511 95% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2249.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 377.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96551724138 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344827586207 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26525198939 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185676392573 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127320954907 0.132149295362 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84015649109 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519893899204 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 56.713368382 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.85 23.380412469 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0777653637 59.4972553346 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.45 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.85 23.380412469 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 45.375198939 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.37837837838 1.64882698954 84% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237523362631 0.391690518653 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0931871326891 0.123202303941 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0802565126542 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.510457625255 0.547984918172 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124825199443 0.149214159877 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931636734794 0.161403998019 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604424817725 0.0892212321368 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.351814527795 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0649794736543 0.0692045440612 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159890325398 0.275328986314 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251681188381 0.0653680567796 39% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.