Should the selection of which field to study be based on the job availability? It's true that the number of jobs is important in the consideration process. But is this the sole factor to be taken into account or other aspect like talent and interest are also necessary? In my view, the selection of field of study should be based on the availability of job opportunities as well as personal talent and interest.
First of all, job availability is of vital importance for college students. The target of college education is to train students with knowledge and skills from a certain field so that they are capable of making a living with their own hands once graduated. The primary goal for a newly graduated college student is to find a satisfactory job and make use of his or her knowledge and skills. A field with shrinking market as well as job numbers would lead students within that field to a tough situation once they graduate, even if they possess great passion for that field. For example, a student who chose to major in physics out of love in physical laws when entering college may find there is little institutions or companies recruiting physics graduates, thus he or she has to select occupations from alternative fields, resulting in the years spent on physics of little usage.
Secondly, selection of learning field should also take considerations on personal talent into account. The availability of jobs should not be the sole factor one considers when entering college. People are born to be different, thus might vary in the fields where one could perform well and badly. If a student with gifted understanding in biology and life science choose to major in computer science simply because of the surge of job opportunities recent years in the latter field, he or she might experience much more difficulty in understanding computer architecture and related courses, which could tremendously damage his or her confidence in personal ability and lead to bad performance on computer science courses. In this case where the talent of oneself does not match with the most popular field in the job market, personal gift should be carefully considered when choosing which field to major in.
Moreover, interest is also an essential part in the evaluation of selection of majority fields. Different students might find disparate disciplines which attract them mostly. Some student may get kindled when analyzing business cases whilst some could show extraordinary passion for history courses. Personal interest also plays a vital part in propelling students to dive into deeper areas in a specific field. Without enough interest in communication courses, one tend to find the principles of communication and code designing much more boring than reading political analysis in the library. Tens of years could be spent in one immutable field for many people, which could become miserable torture for those not interested. If one student is clear about what field of study appeals mostly to himself or herself, selection is no longer difficult to make.
In sum, considerations on the choice of which field to study in college should take all of job availability, talent and personal interest into account. Only by balancing the three factors, students could make the optimal choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are little institutions'?
Suggestion: there are little institutions
...cal laws when entering college may find there is little institutions or companies recruiting physics graduat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...ge. Secondly, selection of learning field should also take considerations on pers...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, for example, as well as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2764.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09023941068 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79279202548 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484346224678 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5213944415 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.173913043 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6086956522 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52173913043 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407915795567 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12527353924 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830877404449 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242957251688 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432009743238 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.