Some people might get along very well with others despite of little knowledge or capability. Some others have been studying diligently in school, as a result of which relationship with others are much weaker. There is sure to be conflict about which type of life is better for a career. As far as I am concerned, to study hard in school would yield better result than just getting along well with others.
Admittedly, to get along with others well is very useful for a man in a career. Relating with others well at least means the communication skills are guaranteed. In many cases practical communication skills are very efficient tool to gain trust of colleagues. To be in good relationships with others also means that others are more willing to help you once you are in trouble rather than a person who is disliked by others. What's more, if in a team there is someone who get along with others very well, the friendly atmosphere would improve the productivity of the whole team.
However, that doesn't means studying hard in school is of little importance. In fact, to spend much time in school study would usually build up the knowledge basis for you. Take the computer science field as example, if someone studies very hard at school, his skill in algorithm, coding and problem analysis would outperform many others. Reliable foundation of knowledge and skills can lead to reliance in teams while working. Colleagues would be more likely to ask you difficult problems, which would be easier to solve with solid foundation. Gradually you would gain trust and reliance of your colleagues. After some time there is chance that you have become the core of your team. That would tremendously improve your job career.
When comparing the importance of the two aspects, studying hard is more important than relating well with people. Basic ability and skills are required for those who related rather well with surrounding people. If they are deprived with their knowledge and skill, then it's likely that they have to beg others for problem solutions. What's even worse, elaborated explanation might be needed for them to understand other's solutions. With favor increasing, such kind of people tend to be looked down upon and kept away with by others. Instead, for a person who keeps working hard both in school and at work, others tend to provide help voluntarily even not asked for. Knowledge basis would also ease the communication barrier in professional problems. Therefore, relating well with people is actually predicated upon hard-working life in school.
In sum, both relating well with others and diligent study in school are very important. Considering that the former is based on the latter, there is no excuse for every one of us to relax in school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...han a person who is disliked by others. Whats more, if in a team there is someone who...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ty of the whole team. However, that doesnt means studying hard in school is of lit...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... trust and reliance of your colleagues. After some time there is chance that you have...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ve to beg others for problem solutions. Whats even worse, elaborated explanation migh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, while, at least, in fact, kind of, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94849785408 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57695570285 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474248927039 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7274111277 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4074074074 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2592592593 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300074047409 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917820369106 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861315034972 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184225706566 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686984350243 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.