The reading passage focuses on the issue of changing workday from 5 days to 4 days a week, claiming that the change will benefit economy, companies and employees. The lecture deals with the same issue. However, the professor in the lecture contends that reducing workday number will not affect companies, economy or life of employees, which casts doubt on what the reading passage claims. In the lecture, ample evidence is harnessed by the professor to bolster his point.
First, although the reading passage argues that company profit will increase after the change due to fewer errors by workers with more rest, the professot points out that companies will be forced to spend more after the change. this is because that health benefit and some other costs for each employee would be the same, which suggests that with more employees money spent on training, medical insurance, office space and computers would increase.
Moreover, in spite of the argument in the reading passage that employment rate in the country would decline after the change, the professor points out that no additional jobs would actually be created after the change. If the change is taken into effect, companies would ask workers to work over time and expect higher productivity from them since hiring new workers would be costly.
Finally, the professor believes that life quality of workers would no be improved after the change, whereas in the reading passage it is thought that employees would have more free time to spend with their families, interests and leisure activities. The professor points out that workers with fewer working time woudl be passed by for promotion and may lose job when economy declines.
Based on these reasons, the professor precisely pinpoints the weaknesses of the reading passage and cogently reveals the core argument of the reading passage, that decreasing workday number in a week from 5 to 4 would be beneficial to economy, companies and employees, is incorrect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies, economy or life of employees, which casts doubt on what the reading pa...
^^^
Line 6, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fewer errors by workers with more rest, the professot points out that companies ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...orced to spend more after the change. this is because that health benefit and some...
^^^^
Line 8, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...the same, which suggests that with more employees money spent on training, medical insura...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... country would decline after the change, the professor points out that no additio...
^^^
Line 15, column 68, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...eves that life quality of workers would no be improved after the change, whereas...
^^
Line 15, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s would no be improved after the change, whereas in the reading passage it is tho...
^^^
Line 19, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he core argument of the reading passage, that decreasing workday number in a week...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23219814241 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43122580553 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510835913313 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1054695406 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.636363636 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.09492273731 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338833305274 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130288460917 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100086807464 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114283009712 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880064688589 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.