Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The issue provides two views of people where one states that corporations should have a responsibility to promote and help the well-being of societies and environments in which they operate. The other is that making the maximum amount of money out of the company should be their only focus and responsibility as long they operate within the laws of the government.
Corporations should take responsibility for the environment and operate without causing major damages to it. Today, a lot of factories' productions involve releasing poisonous gases into the atmosphere and these are detrimental to human survival. These gases are one of the major reasons for global warming which is a deleterious problem across the world. Instead, they can follow any substitutional methods where harmful gases are not the end products or include additional processes that convert the poisonous gases composition to less harmful gases. Some of the corporations release their wastes into rivers which are affecting the health of people relying on those river water. Though there are laws governing the management of wastes and gases released by factories, they cannot encompass all cases possible and many corporates circumvent these restrictions, show false reports and escape from the laws. If corporates innately feel responsible for having proper systems for the release of factory wastes instead of neglecting, many harmful consequences to the environment can be avoided.
If we take the recent Vizag gas leak, for example, many families' health was deteriorated because of the leak and prominently people with breathing problems have faced great difficulty some resulting in their deaths. A lot of citizens around revolted as the company never considered giving employment to the local citizens and always considered taking employees based on recommendations that would benefit the company. This company which was never helpful to the society around has now caused great trouble to the society and environment because of showing negligence in their operations. Though it is a call of the corporates, it would be helpful if they have societal well-being also in mind rather than just their personal benefit.
In any nation, corporations are established for profits which should never be neglected in the decisions and operations of it. These corporations contribute greatly to the economy and determine the nations’ stance at an international level. Only when sufficient profits are produced, there will be scope for more employment and development of the country. But today the whole world is facing problems because of this single focus of corporations and lack of consideration for the environment and society around, thereby resulting in great harm to the environment and humanity.
Hence, although I agree with the idea that profit-making should be a primary focus of corporations, showing irresponsibility and negligence towards any probable damages caused by their corporation shouldn’t be overlooked or ignored. Corporations should try incorporating some methods towards environment friendliness and promote the environment and societal development along with producing profits ensuring the survival of the company and employees working for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gases'' or 'gas's'?
Suggestion: gases'; gas's
...al processes that convert the poisonous gases composition to less harmful gases. Some...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ases composition to less harmful gases. Some of the corporations release their wastes into ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 662, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this river' or 'those rivers'?
Suggestion: this river; those rivers
...fecting the health of people relying on those river water. Though there are laws governing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'families'' or 'family's'?
Suggestion: families'; family's
...ecent Vizag gas leak, for example, many families health was deteriorated because of the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2750.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54435483871 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06107351199 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512096774194 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2127818973 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.736842105 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1052631579 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57894736842 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352724178363 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111351003852 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966280274105 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22098435699 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144359137421 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.