Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Corporations should not be considered only as a money printing tool, rather be seen as instituions which help in development of the socitey and location they are based in. I agree with the claim that corporations should focus on devlopment and well being of the society and environment. As, they generally use locals as the workforce for their success, they use nearby readily available natural resources as raw products, and not caringfor this will only lead to thier doom. The following points will further help appropriate my view on the subject at hand.
Usually corporations set up where they can find cheap labor force for production of goods. The labor force generally lives within few miles of the manufacturing plant of the corporation, for examples if the industry uses water cooling its machines from the local pond, which also acts as primary source of water for the work force and doesn't judiciously manage it. Soon, the water table of the area will deplete leading migration of work force to areas where they can sustain better. If the industry exploits such legal loopholes to maximize profits the main victim will be its own workforce. Which will lead to lack of work force and poor work ethic. Instead, the industry should help preserve the pond by and install water recycling machines to reduce water usage and also do welfare work like installation of wells in the area.
Corporation often try to maximize profits by exploiting resources recklessly, producing good more than needed which sit in warehouses for years and get wasted. This can lead to depletion of natural resources in areas, to avoid this corporations should strictly practice sustainable devlopment, that is use resources in such a way that needs of future generation are not impaired. Corporations should for instance if they use wood as raw material, plant a new tree and look after it, for every chopped tree. This enables balance of resources without harming future needs, and also checks that the indigenous fauna and flora are conserved. In this way, corporations have a better chance of sustaining in the fututre if they are based on exhautible resources as raw product.
Laws for corporation are set at the least possible level, meaning they can dump or move out by products that are not harmful to humans. These laws don't have considerations for other iving beings and can lead to adverse phenomena. Companies dumping fly ash into the air, don't harm humans in any way, but this ash may settle on top soil making is impervious to rain seepage, or makie the surrounding soil more alkaline leading to perishing of local species and gradual increase in local temperature, changing the climate of the region over a period of time. These by prodcuts which are not harmful to humans but to environment should also be monitored by industries abd laws for welfare for society.
Such, problems associated with the corporations, which maximize profit by using legal loopholes exits very much in our world. Proper laws and their execution is still needed to enable proper sustainable devlopment and secure the future while supplying present needs. Corporations should understand their part in this project to sustain throughout.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... source of water for the work force and doesnt judiciously manage it. Soon, the water ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to areas where they can sustain better. If the industry exploits such legal loopho...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of natural resources in areas, to avoid this corporations should strictly practice s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t are not harmful to humans. These laws dont have considerations for other iving bei...
^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...Companies dumping fly ash into the air, dont harm humans in any way, but this ash ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...anging the climate of the region over a period of time. These by prodcuts which are not harmfu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 654, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...environment should also be monitored by industries abd laws for welfare for society. Su...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2691.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05827067669 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68124124958 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531954887218 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7199922069 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.318181818 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183361286497 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615155883573 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484917499957 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107708162297 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483408564634 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.