Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

No knowledge is better than half knowledge, critical judgement by people who do not entirely undertsand a subject may prove more fatal than helpful. It is better to work with someone who knows nothing about a topic than one who knows alf of it. The prompt above very vividly states this that an experets views are considered more valuable than an amateur who doesn't completely undertsands the topics, and his judgements are based of fallacious assumptions at times. I agree with the given prompt for the follwoing reasons stated below.

Experts are people who have worked in the same field for their entire lives and know all the nooks and crannies of the subject, they know the results and the reasons for those results and everthing thar revolves around it. Whereas an amateur may know how to reach to the result but may now know the reasoning behind it. For instance, In chemistry an experts may know why mixing an acid and base results in neturalization reaction, and knows If the component compositions are altered what may happenHe will tell you have the hyroxly ions and hyronium ions behave in the reaction the get the end product. An amateur may be able to do they experiment but may not be able the tell in the conditions of the reactions are changed. Hence, when it comes to test on a larger scale the amateur may wreck havoc on the experiment. So, it can be said that experts opinions are more valueable compared to others even if they have pragmatic experiemces.

Critical jugdements are based on evidences found during an experiments, one who is not an expert may not be able to put two and two togther to get the relevant conclusions. An expert who had been doing such work from the very begining has a lot of pragmatic experience, and can easily draw conclusions from small clues found during the study. Hence his views are highly respected in his field of study. While doing minig involving evolution of gases an amateur may not know about the smell of sulphur in the air rising from underground which can be very dangerous and conitnue the activity. Only a expert can grasp onto this evidence and take the appropriate steps.

Though, experts are very much respected in their scholarly fields, they sometimes lack real life experiences and only have bookish knowledge. At these times, we often see amateurs with not a lot of knowledge but practical experience perform better at a task. This is can still be argued , he may perform better but may still not know the reasons behind what he is doing and why he is doing it that particular way. So, It is important to seek views of experts, they have complete knowledge and hands on experience to understand the situation cogently.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...dered more valuable than an amateur who doesnt completely undertsands the topics and h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... do they experiment but may not be able the tell in the conditions of the reactions are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: WRECK_HAVOC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wreak havoc'?
Suggestion: wreak havoc
... test on a larger scale the amateur may wreck havoc on the experiment So it can be said tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... even if they have pragmatic experiemces Critical jugdements are based on evidenc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...angerous and conitnue the activity Only a expert can grasp onto this evidence and...
^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er at a task This is can still be argued he may perform better but may still not ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, still, whereas, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4789392868 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475583864119 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 471.0 23.0359550562 2045% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2198.0 118.986275619 1847% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 471.0 23.4991977007 2004% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 60.0 5.21951772744 1150% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179725498405 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179725498405 0.0831039109588 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110364768716 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365036329657 0.0667264976115 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 236.1 14.1392134831 1670% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -398.13 48.8420337079 -815% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 185.8 12.1743820225 1526% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.29 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.28 8.38706741573 361% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 190.4 11.2143820225 1698% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 186.0 11.7820224719 1579% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...dered more valuable than an amateur who doesnt completely undertsands the topics and h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... do they experiment but may not be able the tell in the conditions of the reactions are ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: WRECK_HAVOC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wreak havoc'?
Suggestion: wreak havoc
... test on a larger scale the amateur may wreck havoc on the experiment So it can be said tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 928, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... even if they have pragmatic experiemces Critical jugdements are based on evidenc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...angerous and conitnue the activity Only a expert can grasp onto this evidence and...
^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er at a task This is can still be argued he may perform better but may still not ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, still, whereas, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4789392868 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475583864119 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 471.0 23.0359550562 2045% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2198.0 118.986275619 1847% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 471.0 23.4991977007 2004% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 60.0 5.21951772744 1150% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179725498405 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179725498405 0.0831039109588 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110364768716 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365036329657 0.0667264976115 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 236.1 14.1392134831 1670% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -398.13 48.8420337079 -815% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 185.8 12.1743820225 1526% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.29 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.28 8.38706741573 361% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 190.4 11.2143820225 1698% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 186.0 11.7820224719 1579% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.