In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Heroes are not born, they are made, by their actions, thoughts and preaching, a hero brings out the change he wants to see in the world and workds to maintain it. The prompt says that in the modern world of media coverage of various types, people's noble and generous actions are not covered and breoadcasted, untill and unless something drastic or 'spicy' happens. In my opinion, I somewhat agree with this statement and feel that traditional media only coveres stories which include paparazi and drama, more than the motive and true narrative of the protagonist. The following two points will try to explain my case.
Traditional media has a notorious repuation for coverage of limelight celebrities and people of power, even for menial things they do. People who actually work throughtout their lives to bring about a positive change in the world, most often don't get any spotlight by the media outlets. For, example a famous actor who goes for a tree planting drive ones a year, gets coverage by all the media outlets, bloggers and fans. When, we compare this to a normal individual who does a nine to five job during weekdays and rescues animals during the weekend, the actions of the celebrity look hollow. The later never gets any media coverage or even a blog mention, but still he is a true hero, saving lives of uncountable victims of animal cruelity. He keeps on doing this without any greed for fame, he does it to change the world and love for the creatures around us. He saves lives everyweek without getting or asking for any recognition. This is what real heroes do, but as nothing 'spicy' or eye catchy is seen in his work he never gets to be infornt of the camera.
Traditional Media loved to cover stories where lives are saved by ordinary men and women, they used to potray regular people as heroes living among us. This no longer is the case, we rarely now hear about people risking their lives to save drowning kids or jumping into bulding on fire and rescue the lady from the bathtub. This happens till date in parts of the world, but is never covered by television media, unless someone loses his or her life while trying to save other lives. Only then can they be proclaimed as heroes. The definition for these kind of heroes has changed by the paparazi.
Recently people have started sharing stories about heroes among us on social media platforms, where they can have their own voice and are not dependant on traditional means. People who previously had been doing great works for betterment of the soceity have been portrayed to millions and billions of people for the respect they deserve. One no longer needs to lose his life to a hero among living men. One can live as a hero for as long as his life lasts. He can continue to be a hero for his entire life while being alive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...positive change in the world most often dont get any spotlight by the media outlets ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
...rmal individual who does a nine to five job during weekdays and rescues animals dur...
^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f uncountable victims of animal cruelity He keeps on doing this without any greed...
^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding creatures'?
Suggestion: the surrounding creatures
...oes it to change the world and love for the creatures around us He saves lives everyweek without gettin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1043, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e never gets to be infornt of the camera Traditional Media loved to cover stories...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...proclaimed as heroes The definition for these kind of heroes has changed by the paparazi ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...ey can have their own voice and are not dependant on traditional means People who previou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, so, still, then, while, for example, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53907815631 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25287048005 2.79657885939 81% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50501002004 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 499.0 23.0359550562 2166% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2265.0 118.986275619 1904% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 499.0 23.4991977007 2123% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 84.0 5.21951772744 1609% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230946253383 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230946253383 0.0831039109588 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142438607583 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022692765038 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 249.5 14.1392134831 1765% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -426.55 48.8420337079 -873% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 196.7 12.1743820225 1616% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.53 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 31.61 8.38706741573 377% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 201.6 11.2143820225 1798% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 250.0 11.7820224719 2122% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.