There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
According to my point of view, society should take steps needed to preserve flora and fauna species which have been endangered by rapid urbanization and industrialization. I diagree with the given assertion. Plants and animals which have been endangered by human activity should be protected from further damage by not harming their natural habitat by extrinsic human activities. All beings help in maintaining the natural order of the environment, disbalancing this natural balance can lead to a lot of problems. The following points will help to elaborate my position further.
If indigenous species are harmed by human activites and endangered to a lot number it can lead to an unbalanced food chain in the surrounding biome. For instance, if due to urbanization a large number of electricity and communication poles are installed in an area at the expense of deforestration, it can lead to death of birds by electric shocks and their endangerment. Many more such cases can be formulated which show how our greed has led to extinction of many species and endangered many others. As responsible people we should own up to our mistakes and work on fixing it. Due to ever growing population of humans requirement of space is always demanded but this should be at the expense of indigenous species.
Loss of species can cause chaos as it breaks the food chain making some species to prosper in population and cause potential harm to a biome.For example, A decrease in number of birds will lead to increase in number of insects which will be become a problem to humans residing in the area as insects may carry diseases which can be transmitted to humans. For, which further extermination will be required. This will completely wipe out all natural species of the biome. From ths example we see how low number of a single block of food chain member can disturb the full chain. So, protecting and endangred specie becomes essentially important as it can lead to perishing of all other connected species, leading to catastrophe in a local biome.
Protecting species is a humanitarian cause and should not require any justification in the first place, all species have the right to live on this planet and it is not only for humans. As the smartest being of the planet we should understand this fact and respect all the other species. The cost involved in this may be huge but no cost if more than life of a living thing or a specie. At the end what matters is life and not the monitary value associated with it.
These following points show how it is important to protect all the species of the planet and preserve our rich environment. We should respect and protect all the species of our local biomes and not wait to endanger them and then start to work to save them, which can lead to unalances situation and harm to our own race.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e. For instance, if due to urbanization a large number of electricity and communication poles are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ion and cause potential harm to a biome.For example, A decrease in number of birds ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79557870721 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0364336672 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151403892362 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483810738628 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367447873513 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901753825521 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106960489907 0.0667264976115 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.